Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: lp50xx: fix LED children names

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 18/07/2022 17:18, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 5:13 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The lp50xx LEDs expects to have single-color LED children with unit
>> addresses.  This is required by the driver and provided by existing
>> DTSes.  Fix the binding to match actual usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> Fixes: dce1452301e7 ("dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers")
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml | 8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
>> index f12fe5b53f30..c274a10bbde6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
>> @@ -65,8 +65,14 @@ patternProperties:
>>            for the child node.  The LED modules can either be used stand alone
>>            or grouped into a module bank.
>>
>> +      '#address-cells':
>> +        const: 1
>> +
>> +      '#size-cells':
>> +        const: 0
>> +
>>      patternProperties:
>> -      "(^led-[0-9a-f]$|led)":
>> +      "^led@[0-9a-f]+$":
> 
> Looks like you forgot to update the example. Now failing with
> 'unevaluatedProperties' fixed:

Yeah, this was fixed in my other patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607075247.58048-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

and I assumed Pavel will also pick it up... It has been waiting for more
than one month.


Best regards,
Krzysztof