* [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** @ 2000-06-22 12:11 Andreas Rey 2000-06-22 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andreas Rey @ 2000-06-22 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm Hello guys :-) I write a LVM patch for linuxkernel 2.2.16 ! I send it to Heinz. It's a agreement with Heinz that we should test it. I tested my patch with 5 machines with SuSE and Debian. All so i used Reiserfs patch 3.5.22 for kernel 2.2.16. No problems :-)) Attension : SuSE user must use the SuSE patch !!!! Heinz looks at saturday into the patch. Patch is avaible at ftp://ftp.ping-net.de:/pub/linux/lvm Please send bugs or errors to e-mail: daniel@mehrmann.ping-net.de PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY E-MAIL TO THIS ADRESS IN THE HEADER OF THIS E-MAIL greetings Daniel Mehrmann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** 2000-06-22 12:11 [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** Andreas Rey @ 2000-06-22 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig 2000-06-23 5:39 ` Andreas Rey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2000-06-22 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Rey; +Cc: linux-lvm On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Andreas Rey wrote: > > Hello guys :-) > > I write a LVM patch for linuxkernel 2.2.16 ! I send it to Heinz. > It's a agreement with Heinz that we should test it. Why don't you simply use andera's code (ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/ kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.2/2.2.17pre4aa1/ 14_bigmem-rawio-lvm-2.2.15pre13aa1-6.gz) ? Christoph -- Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** 2000-06-22 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2000-06-23 5:39 ` Andreas Rey [not found] ` <005101c000cd$f3be3b00$17d235c3@miguel> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andreas Rey @ 2000-06-23 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm ----- Original Message ----- From: Christoph Hellwig <chhellwig@gmx.net> To: Andreas Rey <Andreas.Rey@sth.steuer.ofd.niedersachsen.de> Cc: <linux-lvm@msede.com> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** > On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Andreas Rey wrote: > > > > Hello guys :-) > > > > I write a LVM patch for linuxkernel 2.2.16 ! I send it to Heinz. > > It's a agreement with Heinz that we should test it. > > Why don't you simply use andera's code (ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/ > kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.2/2.2.17pre4aa1/ > 14_bigmem-rawio-lvm-2.2.15pre13aa1-6.gz) ? I want made a patch from last stable version by Heinz. The code from andrea is really unstable and a "pre-release". If you you are look into tho code (Do you do that ?) you see that's are snapshots for SuSE (only SuSE) or new code. I think we should use only stable code for a stable kernel. Yes of course I can use this code but then I have a new version and not a patch. A patch is only stable a code who I desgin for the last stable kernel. Heinz ask me if i want write allso a version with new code from andrea. That's looks interesting :-) Write patches are my hobby not my work. Well, if i have time I want to write a new version and then a new patch. greetings Daniel Mehrmann e-mail: daniel@mehrmann.ping-net.de ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <005101c000cd$f3be3b00$17d235c3@miguel>]
* Re: [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** [not found] ` <005101c000cd$f3be3b00$17d235c3@miguel> @ 2000-07-10 9:55 ` Andreas Rey 2000-07-13 22:55 ` [linux-lvm] invalid i/o protocal version Adam Crews 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andreas Rey @ 2000-07-10 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm ----- Original Message ----- From: Falcon <falcon_lvm@yahoo.com> To: Andreas Rey <Andreas.Rey@sth.steuer.ofd.niedersachsen.de> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 2:16 AM Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** > Hi , where can i find the patch ??? ftp://ftp.ping-net.de:/pub/lvm or ftp://area51.ping-net.de:/pub/lvm/patch-2.2.16 greetings Daniel Mehrmann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [linux-lvm] invalid i/o protocal version 2000-07-10 9:55 ` Andreas Rey @ 2000-07-13 22:55 ` Adam Crews 2000-07-14 0:42 ` Eric M. Hopper 2000-07-14 1:31 ` Brian Poole 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Adam Crews @ 2000-07-13 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm Hello I have just downgraded from kernel 2.4.0-test1 to 2.2.16. I installed the lvm patch to 2.2.16 and can load the lvm module just fine. [root@scooby /root]# lsmod Module Size Used by lvm 98216 0 (autoclean) soundcore 3204 0 (autoclean) (unused) ide-probe 6512 0 autofs 9504 1 (autoclean) eepro100 16752 2 (autoclean) unix 11396 89 (autoclean) ide-disk 6332 0 ide-mod 41656 0 [ide-probe ide-disk] ncr53c8xx 52336 6 sd_mod 16328 6 scsi_mod 40716 2 [ncr53c8xx sd_mod] [root@scooby /root]# cat /proc/lvm LVM module version 0.8i (02/10/1999) Total: 0 VGs 0 PVs 0 LVs (0 LVs open) Global: 140 bytes vmalloced IOP version: 5 0:05:09 active [root@scooby /root]# When I try to do any lvm commands I get the following: [root@scooby /root]# vgscan -d -v <1> lvm_get_iop_version -- CALLED <22> lvm_check_special -- CALLED <22> lvm_check_special -- LEAVING <1> lvm_get_iop_version -- AFTER ioctl ret: 0 <1> lvm_get_iop_version -- LEAVING with ret: 5 vgscan -- invalid i/o protocol version [root@scooby /root]# I have re-compiled the lvm tools against the 2.2.16 src and libs, but I get the same message. How can I fix this, or what other info is needed to figure out what is happening? -adam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] invalid i/o protocal version 2000-07-13 22:55 ` [linux-lvm] invalid i/o protocal version Adam Crews @ 2000-07-14 0:42 ` Eric M. Hopper 2000-07-14 1:31 ` Brian Poole 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric M. Hopper @ 2000-07-14 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adam Crews; +Cc: linux-lvm [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 924 bytes --] On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 03:55:07PM -0700, Adam Crews wrote: > I have re-compiled the lvm tools against the 2.2.16 src and libs, but > I get the same message. > > How can I fix this, or what other info is needed to figure out what is > happening? I'm betting you didn't install the older versions of the executables. Look carefully at which version of the LVM you're patching your kernel to, and make sure that's the version of the utilities you're using. The error message you're getting means that the utility versions don't match up with the kernel module/patch version. Have fun (if at all possible), -- Its name is Public Opinion. It is held in reverence. It settles everything. Some think it is the voice of God. Loyalty to petrified opinion never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul. ---Mark Twain -- Eric Hopper (hopper@omnifarious.mn.org http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper) -- [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] invalid i/o protocal version 2000-07-13 22:55 ` [linux-lvm] invalid i/o protocal version Adam Crews 2000-07-14 0:42 ` Eric M. Hopper @ 2000-07-14 1:31 ` Brian Poole 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Brian Poole @ 2000-07-14 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adam Crews; +Cc: linux-lvm From the FAQ (http://linux.msede.com/lvm/faq.html#q20): >20. LVM tools complain about "invalid i/o protocol version" > >The LVM kernel and user mode parts use common data structures to exchange >information. The i/o protocol version specifies the version of this data >structures. The kernel and user mode parts must use the same i/o protocol >version in order to communicate. > >If you get this error message you need to obtain a new version of the LVM >tools which uses a compatible protocol version. Looks like you just need to upgrade your 0.8i to 0.8final, and you should be okay. 0.8i appears to have been a pre-release version anyways, so upgrading to the final, stable version is a good idea in any case. -b On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Adam Crews wrote: > Hello > > I have just downgraded from kernel 2.4.0-test1 to 2.2.16. > > I installed the lvm patch to 2.2.16 and can load the lvm module just fine. > [root@scooby /root]# lsmod > Module Size Used by > lvm 98216 0 (autoclean) > soundcore 3204 0 (autoclean) (unused) > ide-probe 6512 0 > autofs 9504 1 (autoclean) > eepro100 16752 2 (autoclean) > unix 11396 89 (autoclean) > ide-disk 6332 0 > ide-mod 41656 0 [ide-probe ide-disk] > ncr53c8xx 52336 6 > sd_mod 16328 6 > scsi_mod 40716 2 [ncr53c8xx sd_mod] > [root@scooby /root]# cat /proc/lvm > LVM module version 0.8i (02/10/1999) > > Total: 0 VGs 0 PVs 0 LVs (0 LVs open) > Global: 140 bytes vmalloced IOP version: 5 0:05:09 active > [root@scooby /root]# > > > When I try to do any lvm commands I get the following: > [root@scooby /root]# vgscan -d -v > <1> lvm_get_iop_version -- CALLED > <22> lvm_check_special -- CALLED > <22> lvm_check_special -- LEAVING > <1> lvm_get_iop_version -- AFTER ioctl ret: 0 > <1> lvm_get_iop_version -- LEAVING with ret: 5 > vgscan -- invalid i/o protocol version > > [root@scooby /root]# > > > I have re-compiled the lvm tools against the 2.2.16 src and libs, but I > get the same message. > > How can I fix this, or what other info is needed to figure out what is > happening? > > -adam > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-07-14 1:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-06-22 12:11 [linux-lvm] *** LVM patch for kernel 2.2.16 is avaible !! *** Andreas Rey
2000-06-22 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2000-06-23 5:39 ` Andreas Rey
[not found] ` <005101c000cd$f3be3b00$17d235c3@miguel>
2000-07-10 9:55 ` Andreas Rey
2000-07-13 22:55 ` [linux-lvm] invalid i/o protocal version Adam Crews
2000-07-14 0:42 ` Eric M. Hopper
2000-07-14 1:31 ` Brian Poole
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox