Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jon+lvm@silicide.dk
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system.
Date: Wed Mar 12 16:14:01 2003	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030312221320.GA15196@gw.silicide.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030312195217.GC18876@auctionwatch.com>

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:52:17AM -0800, Petro wrote:
> I've got a couple of brand new boxes I'm trying to get LVM set up
> properly on. 
> 
> These machines have 6 200GiB drives attached to a 3ware controller card,
> for a total of 1,200,000,000,000 bytes of storage. 

later down you write you need speed. In that case i would suggest
ditching the hardware raid, and use pure software raid, it is faster.
I dont mind 3ware, i have dome myself, but my benchmarking revealed
that software was faster.


> I'm running kernel 2.4.18, with LVM version 1.0.3, and the lvmtools
> version 1.0.1rc3-1 (long story, but upgrading is a path-of-last-resort).

if you need snapshots, get 1.0.7

 
> Initially I had the drives set up as a single raid0 device, but doing a
> pvcreate on it failed with a message that said something about "can't
> get size". 

strange, linux should be able to handle 2T block devices.


> So I set up 2 3 disk RAID0 devices, and did a vgcreate /dev/sda /dev/sdb.
> 
> Now, one question I have is: 
> 
>     Does this concatenate the devices, or does it interleave the
>     devices? IE do I have a stripe of stripes, or two stripes? 

that depends. You can stripe the lvm, but then you cant resize it.
if you made a LV, then it would proberly just allokate all on one
"disk", aka sda, and then on sdb.


> Since I need the disk write rate of all 6 drives, I'm *REALLY* hoping
> that it's interleaved. 

sorry... it is not interleaved.



JonB
ps: how big a partition do you need stripping for? Do you need the
advanced LVM stuff, like resize, snapshot...

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-12 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-12 13:53 [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system Petro
2003-03-12 16:14 ` jon+lvm [this message]
2003-03-12 16:24   ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 16:50     ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:00       ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:17         ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:25           ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:46   ` Petro
2003-03-13  2:44     ` Jon Bendtsen
2003-03-13 18:25       ` Petro
2003-03-14  2:32         ` Adrian Phillips
2003-03-15 13:50       ` Steven Lembark
2003-03-15 16:37         ` jon+lvm
2003-03-18  3:14           ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12 21:03 Barry, Christopher
2003-03-13  2:45 ` Jon Bendtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030312221320.GA15196@gw.silicide.dk \
    --to=jon+lvm@silicide.dk \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox