From: jon+lvm@silicide.dk
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system.
Date: Wed Mar 12 16:14:01 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030312221320.GA15196@gw.silicide.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030312195217.GC18876@auctionwatch.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:52:17AM -0800, Petro wrote:
> I've got a couple of brand new boxes I'm trying to get LVM set up
> properly on.
>
> These machines have 6 200GiB drives attached to a 3ware controller card,
> for a total of 1,200,000,000,000 bytes of storage.
later down you write you need speed. In that case i would suggest
ditching the hardware raid, and use pure software raid, it is faster.
I dont mind 3ware, i have dome myself, but my benchmarking revealed
that software was faster.
> I'm running kernel 2.4.18, with LVM version 1.0.3, and the lvmtools
> version 1.0.1rc3-1 (long story, but upgrading is a path-of-last-resort).
if you need snapshots, get 1.0.7
> Initially I had the drives set up as a single raid0 device, but doing a
> pvcreate on it failed with a message that said something about "can't
> get size".
strange, linux should be able to handle 2T block devices.
> So I set up 2 3 disk RAID0 devices, and did a vgcreate /dev/sda /dev/sdb.
>
> Now, one question I have is:
>
> Does this concatenate the devices, or does it interleave the
> devices? IE do I have a stripe of stripes, or two stripes?
that depends. You can stripe the lvm, but then you cant resize it.
if you made a LV, then it would proberly just allokate all on one
"disk", aka sda, and then on sdb.
> Since I need the disk write rate of all 6 drives, I'm *REALLY* hoping
> that it's interleaved.
sorry... it is not interleaved.
JonB
ps: how big a partition do you need stripping for? Do you need the
advanced LVM stuff, like resize, snapshot...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-12 13:53 [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system Petro
2003-03-12 16:14 ` jon+lvm [this message]
2003-03-12 16:24 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 16:50 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:00 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:17 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:25 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:46 ` Petro
2003-03-13 2:44 ` Jon Bendtsen
2003-03-13 18:25 ` Petro
2003-03-14 2:32 ` Adrian Phillips
2003-03-15 13:50 ` Steven Lembark
2003-03-15 16:37 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-18 3:14 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12 21:03 Barry, Christopher
2003-03-13 2:45 ` Jon Bendtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030312221320.GA15196@gw.silicide.dk \
--to=jon+lvm@silicide.dk \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox