From: Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system.
Date: Thu Mar 13 18:25:02 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030314002507.GE22003@auctionwatch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E704492.DF386E61@silicide.dk>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:42:58AM +0100, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
> Petro wrote:
> [cut]
> > The production data we gathered showed the opposite--at least for the
> > 3ware cards in our environment (we had about 5-8% more overhead
> > running the 3ware cards RAID0 than we did running either raw disk
> > (cheap IDE cards) or having the 3ware card pretend to be a jbod.
> you mean the cpu was more used ?
No, meaning we got better overall performance out of Mysql. Fewer
running threads, threads connected and disconnected better etc.
> > Unfortunately I'll probably not get a chance to redo these.
> a shame, because if you dont need snapshots, LVM is a overhead.
It may come to that.
> > > > Since I need the disk write rate of all 6 drives, I'm *REALLY* hoping
> > > > that it's interleaved.
> > > sorry... it is not interleaved.
> > > JonB
> > > ps: how big a partition do you need stripping for? Do you need the
> > > advanced LVM stuff, like resize, snapshot...
> > I need slightly over 1T of formatted disk space on each system.
> > Which means i really need to find a way to send an <alt-3> through
> > an ssh session to a telnet window.
> may i suggest
> http://www.realweasel.com/intro.html
> It's a pci GFX<->serial card.
> I dont have one, but i want 3. If you buy one... do tell us how it
> works.
That won't solve the problem.
See, my servers are 55 miles down the road. I ssh to a machine that
connects to a private network, on which are a bunch of portmasters
and APCs. I then telnet to the Portmaster ports, which hook to cua0.
It looks basically like I call he "smart hands" at the Colo and talk
them through redoing the RAID volumes.
--
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray,
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right
answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion
of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-13 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-12 13:53 [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system Petro
2003-03-12 16:14 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 16:24 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 16:50 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:00 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:17 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:25 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:46 ` Petro
2003-03-13 2:44 ` Jon Bendtsen
2003-03-13 18:25 ` Petro [this message]
2003-03-14 2:32 ` Adrian Phillips
2003-03-15 13:50 ` Steven Lembark
2003-03-15 16:37 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-18 3:14 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12 21:03 Barry, Christopher
2003-03-13 2:45 ` Jon Bendtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030314002507.GE22003@auctionwatch.com \
--to=petro@auctionwatch.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox