From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] software raid or lvm?
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:38:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040607153809.GM31405@kluge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40C48905.80608@blocked.name>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 541 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:25:57PM +0200, philip wrote:
> like to install suse91, which doesn't support siimage chipset, so i've to
> use software raid or lvm.
> what would be better/faster?
Well, what are you trying to do? If you want redundancy, go with RAID.
If you want volume management, go with LVM. I'd say you should do both
(RAID the disks then use LVM on top), but without more data there is no
answer for "better/faster".
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Why is there a file in the /usr/include/unused directory?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-07 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-07 15:25 [linux-lvm] software raid or lvm? philip
2004-06-07 15:38 ` Theo Van Dinter [this message]
2004-06-07 17:48 ` philip
2004-06-07 18:15 ` philip
2004-06-10 5:19 ` Urs Thuermann
2004-06-07 16:28 ` Karen Shaeffer
2004-06-07 18:16 ` philip
2004-06-07 18:19 ` philip
2004-06-07 18:45 ` David Greaves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040607153809.GM31405@kluge.net \
--to=felicity@kluge.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox