* [linux-lvm] BLOCK_SIZE?
@ 2000-12-08 15:29 Michael Tokarev
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2000-12-08 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Little question that I already posted here a week ago or so.
What drawbacks can suffer if one changes BLOCK_SIZE in
include/linux/lvm.h from 1024 (or 4096 on S/390) to 512?
I can't understand from code what't a real purpose of
this constant, -- lvm seemed to work well with BLOCK_SIZE=512,
no troubles so far, -- but i'm still not shure if it is
"legal" to change that. At least there is some purpose on
having different values for this constant on S/390 and other
platforms, -- again, can't see that purposes...
Oh yes, this is about 2.2 kernel and lvm-0.9.
Thank you.
Regards,
Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-12-08 15:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-08 15:29 [linux-lvm] BLOCK_SIZE? Michael Tokarev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox