Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] block: bugfix for Amiga partition overflow check patch

[Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>]

Hi Geert,

thanks for the review!

Am 05.07.2023 um 19:28 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:38 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Making 'blk' sector_t (i.e. 64 bit if LBD support is active)
>> fails the 'blk>0' test in the partition block loop if a
>> value of (signed int) -1 is used to mark the end of the
>> partition block list.
>>
>> This bug was introduced in patch 3 of my prior Amiga partition
>> support fixes series, and spotted by Christian Zigotzky when
>> testing the latest block updates.
>>
>> Explicitly cast 'blk' to signed int to allow use of -1 to
>> terminate the partition block linked list.
>>
>> Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
>> Fixes: b6f3f28f60 ("block: add overflow checks for Amiga partition support")
>> Message-ID: 024ce4fa-cc6d-50a2-9aae-3701d0ebf668@xenosoft.de
>
> Please drop this line.

Because it's redundant, as I've also used Link:?

Cheers,

	Michael


>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.2
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/024ce4fa-cc6d-50a2-9aae-3701d0ebf668@xenosoft.de
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
>> Tested-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>