Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] block: bugfix for Amiga partition overflow check patch

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 7/5/23 4:34?PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/5/23 4:25?PM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> On 6/07/23 10:13, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> should be enough for it to go into stable from 5.2 and onwards.
>>>> OK - I wasn't certain whether you wanted the Fixes or stable tag dropped.
>>>>>> (Greg didn't seem to object to the Fixes: as such, just to the
>>>>>> incorrect version prereq)
>>>>> I think it's really confusing... A patch should only have a Fixes tag if
>>>>> it's fixing a specific bug in that patch. Either it is, in which case
>>>>> you would not need Cc stable at all since it's only in 6.5-rc, or it
>>>> It is fixing a bug in b6f3f28f60. I should have checked whether the
>>>> patch series had already gone to release, not just -rc, instead of
>>>> just adding the stable tag out of caution.
>>> But this is the confusion - if it's fixing a bug in b6f3f28f60, then why
>>> is it marked as needing to get backported much further back, predating
>>> that commit?
>>
>> I see - it doesn't need to be backported that far back _alone_. It
>> only needs to be applied after  b6f3f28f60 once that one has been
>> backported.
> 
> OK I see - I think there's some serious misunderstandings here then :-)
> 
> It sounds like it fixes a bug in b6f3f28f60 alone, and it has no
> business going into stable. The commit should _just_ be marked with it
> fixing that. If someone were to backport that previous series, then
> their tooling or diligence should notice this dependency and this
> current commit should be picked as well.
> 
> There should be no Cc: stable on this patch at all, I'll fix it up.

Here's what I have:

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux/commit/?h=block-6.5&id=7eb1e47696aa231b1a567846bbe3a1e1befe1854

which has the following manual edits:

1) Change the title/subject line of the patch. "bugfix for Amiga
partition overflow check patch" means very little. The fact that this
patch is a bug fix for a previous commit is explicit with the Fixes
line.

2) Break lines at 72-74 chars, yours were very short.

3) Drop message-id

4) Drop cc stable tag

5) Drop the revision history. This should be behind three '---' lines
and then it's dropped automatically.

Let's hope this is it for Amiga partition handling!

-- 
Jens Axboe