From: Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org, Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: new ARAnyM with better FPU
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:33:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1332354822.7194.4.camel@aspire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXLUEYpiGrHrtDw=MjSZn3yZ1Of8TLf4wPmiDr9grpreg@mail.gmail.com>
Geert Uytterhoeven píše v Wed 21. 03. 2012 v 16:08 +0100:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 14:41, Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz> wrote:
> > I am wondering if it is worth backporting the libmpfr and making new
> > ARAnyM packages for 10.04 when the 12.04 is to be released in a month.
>
> Indeed, next month we'll all be forced into the new GUI generation...
Actually we won't be forced into that. First, the 10.04 LTS is supported
till April next year so people can stay on it for another year. That's
why I was wondering whether to backport the libmpfr or not.
And second, we have several possibilities of not getting United :-)
There's the Classic mode of Gnome Shell that is basically good old Gnome
2 (just rewritten to use newer libraries), then the new Gnome Shell with
some particular extensions can be used almost like a normal desktop
(Linus and other reported) and at last but not least, the
http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/ is maturing quickly!
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-21 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-20 22:24 new ARAnyM with better FPU Petr Stehlik
[not found] ` <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1203210905300.23907@herc.mirbsd.org>
2012-03-21 9:34 ` Petr Stehlik
2012-03-21 10:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-03-21 13:41 ` Petr Stehlik
2012-03-21 15:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-03-21 18:33 ` Petr Stehlik [this message]
2012-03-21 18:44 ` Thorsten Glaser
2012-03-23 12:26 ` ARAnyM 0.9.13 with MPFR even for Lucid Petr Stehlik
2012-03-23 14:54 ` Thorsten Glaser
2012-03-25 9:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-06 23:38 ` Thorsten Glaser
2012-03-26 20:41 ` new ARAnyM with better FPU Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-03-27 8:06 ` Petr Stehlik
2012-03-27 15:24 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-03-29 10:49 ` Petr Stehlik
2012-05-06 23:19 ` Thorsten Glaser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1332354822.7194.4.camel@aspire \
--to=pstehlik@sophics.cz \
--cc=debian-68k@lists.debian.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox