public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/setup: Use pr_*() instead of plain printk()
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 14:07:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372712853.2481.24.camel@joe-AO722> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUA3+gLi00Tvik2SjZaRYSC2sMMmP9TMH=Vb1dAubXx3Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 23:02 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> >
> >> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void __init m68k_parse_bootinfo(const struct bi_record *record)
> > []
> >> -                             printk("m68k_parse_bootinfo: too many memory chunks\n");
> >> +                             pr_warn("m68k_parse_bootinfo: too many memory chunks\n");
> >
> > These are generally better written by
> > removing the hand-written function name
> > and using "%s: ", __func__
> >
> >                                 pr_warn("%s: too many memory chunks\n",
> >                                         __func__);
> 
> I had tried that, too. But surprisingly (although the same function
> name was in two
> messages), it increased the size of the kernel image.

That's not surprising really.
There is more call frame stack per use too.

It does eliminate any issue with function renaming
though and is also less typo prone.

And, at some point, those __func__ uses could be
identified and rolled into a mechanism to emit the
function name via a standardized use of %pf and
__builtin_return_address(0) in the printk subsystem.

cheers, Joe

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-01 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1372585689-29492-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
2013-06-30 22:22 ` [PATCH] m68k/setup: Use pr_*() instead of plain printk() Joe Perches
2013-07-01 21:02   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-01 21:07     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2013-06-30  9:48 Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1372712853.2481.24.camel@joe-AO722 \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox