* m68k: Any plans to move over to arch/m68k/include?
@ 2008-11-25 20:11 Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-25 20:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-11-25 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven, Roman Zippel, linux-m68k
Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include
Are you planning to do so for m68k for next merge window?
Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300
The other are done or have patches queued for next merge window to do so.
Can I be of any help?
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: m68k: Any plans to move over to arch/m68k/include?
2008-11-25 20:11 m68k: Any plans to move over to arch/m68k/include? Sam Ravnborg
@ 2008-11-25 20:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-11-29 13:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2008-11-25 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: Roman Zippel, Greg Ungerer, linux-m68k, uClinux list
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include
>
> Are you planning to do so for m68k for next merge window?
So far _I_ don't have those plans.
> Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300
> The other are done or have patches queued for next merge window to do so.
>
> Can I be of any help?
However, m68k keeps working fine after `mv include/asm-m68k
arch/m68k/include/asm'. The problem is m68knommu, which includes header files
from m68k. The m68k and m68knommu headers have to be merged first, cfr. Arnd
Bergmann's comments and suggestions on linux-arch a while ago.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: m68k: Any plans to move over to arch/m68k/include?
2008-11-25 20:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2008-11-29 13:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-11-29 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Roman Zippel, Greg Ungerer, linux-m68k, uClinux list
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:36:37PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include
> >
> > Are you planning to do so for m68k for next merge window?
>
> So far _I_ don't have those plans.
>
> > Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300
> > The other are done or have patches queued for next merge window to do so.
> >
> > Can I be of any help?
>
> However, m68k keeps working fine after `mv include/asm-m68k
> arch/m68k/include/asm'. The problem is m68knommu, which includes header files
> from m68k. The m68k and m68knommu headers have to be merged first, cfr. Arnd
> Bergmann's comments and suggestions on linux-arch a while ago.
This one (and the thread following it)
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=121753383713553&w=2
I agree this is the correct approach.
Looks reasonable simple to do for anyone having the relevant toolchains
and assuming only few pending patches in this area.
I do not have time to do it for now :-(
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-29 13:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-25 20:11 m68k: Any plans to move over to arch/m68k/include? Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-25 20:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-11-29 13:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox