public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, stable@kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.28 stable] m68knommu: fix m68knommu defconfig can't build
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:07:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090112110739.GA17514@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090112105942.GA10936@uranus.ravnborg.org>


* Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:

> We just did the exercise with sparc/sparc64 unification and if you 
> forget the few times I broke sparc32 then it went well with only limited 
> problems.

We also had the x86 unification finished in the past year which went very 
well too, so i can only encourage similar efforts.

> One key factor why it went well was that patches were reviewed and 
> applied within a few days whch is why I stresses that the maintainer 
> needs spare time to support the effort.

Yes.

Unification is the Linux meme of the century i guess ;-)

There's two main unification themes:

 - per arch unification (x86, powerpc, sparc

 - cross-arch unification: the moving of useful stuff out of architectures 
   into the core kernel (genirq, gtod, etc.).

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-12 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-30 10:44 [PATCH for 2.6.28 stable] m68knommu: fix m68knommu defconfig can't build KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-06  6:20 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-01-12 10:35   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-12 10:44   ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-12 10:59     ` Sam Ravnborg
     [not found]     ` <20090112105942.GA10936@uranus.ravnborg.org>
2009-01-12 11:07       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-12 11:12       ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-12 13:06     ` Greg Ungerer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090112110739.GA17514@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox