public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Number of interrupts on Sun3?
@ 2011-04-27 14:53 Geert Uytterhoeven
  2011-04-27 15:51 ` Sam Creasey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2011-04-27 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sam Creasey; +Cc: Linux/m68k

	Hi Sammy,

Do you know why NR_IRQS is defined to 200 in arch/m68k/include/asm/irq.h,
while arch/m68k/sun3/sun3ints.c:sun3_init_IRQ() sets up only 128 user
interrupts?

I would expect either NR_IRQS to be 132 (8 auto + 128 user), or
sun3_init_IRQ() to set up all 192 user interrupts.

Ah, commit 35bdd52d7401b1208552523d6fa28d4a37dbc74d ("m68k: Correct number of
interrupts for Sun3") changed it from 192 to 128.
I guess it forgot to reduce NR_IRQS?

Still, why is user interrupt 127 (IRQ_USER+127) called "vec255"?
That should be either interrupt 191, or "vec191"?

Is that a misconversion in commit ebba61d5b05ecfda388dd4c156bafdb78d398055
("[PATCH] m68k: convert sun3 irq code")?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Number of interrupts on Sun3?
  2011-04-27 14:53 Number of interrupts on Sun3? Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2011-04-27 15:51 ` Sam Creasey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sam Creasey @ 2011-04-27 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Sam Creasey, Linux/m68k


On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:53:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>       Hi Sammy,
> 
> Do you know why NR_IRQS is defined to 200 in
> arch/m68k/include/asm/irq.h,
> while arch/m68k/sun3/sun3ints.c:sun3_init_IRQ() sets up only 128
> user
> interrupts?
> 
> I would expect either NR_IRQS to be 132 (8 auto + 128 user), or
> sun3_init_IRQ() to set up all 192 user interrupts.
> 
> Ah, commit 35bdd52d7401b1208552523d6fa28d4a37dbc74d ("m68k: Correct
> number of
> interrupts for Sun3") changed it from 192 to 128.
> I guess it forgot to reduce NR_IRQS?

That's my guess (forgetting to reduce NR_IRQS).   I don't remember why
(if there was a good reason) I changed the argument to
m68k_setup_user_interrupt() down to 128...  I feel like we should be
setting up all of the user interrupts.

> Still, why is user interrupt 127 (IRQ_USER+127) called "vec255"?
> That should be either interrupt 191, or "vec191"?
> 
> Is that a misconversion in commit
> ebba61d5b05ecfda388dd4c156bafdb78d398055
> ("[PATCH] m68k: convert sun3 irq code")?

Yeah, I think it should have been renamed in that commit.

-- Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-27 15:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-27 14:53 Number of interrupts on Sun3? Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-27 15:51 ` Sam Creasey

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox