From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] dma-direct: simplify the use atomic pool logic in dma_direct_alloc
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 09:41:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231009074121.219686-4-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009074121.219686-1-hch@lst.de>
The logic in dma_direct_alloc when to use the atomic pool vs remapping
grew a bit unreadable. Consolidate it into a single check, and clean
up the set_uncached vs remap logic a bit as well.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
kernel/dma/direct.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index ec410af1d8a14e..1327d04fa32a25 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -234,27 +234,22 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
dma_handle);
/*
- * Otherwise remap if the architecture is asking for it. But
- * given that remapping memory is a blocking operation we'll
- * instead have to dip into the atomic pools.
+ * Otherwise we require the architecture to either be able to
+ * mark arbitrary parts of the kernel direct mapping uncached,
+ * or remapped it uncached.
*/
+ set_uncached = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_UNCACHED);
remap = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP);
- if (remap) {
- if (dma_direct_use_pool(dev, gfp))
- return dma_direct_alloc_from_pool(dev, size,
- dma_handle, gfp);
- } else {
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_UNCACHED))
- return NULL;
- set_uncached = true;
- }
+ if (!set_uncached && !remap)
+ return NULL;
}
/*
- * Decrypting memory may block, so allocate the memory from the atomic
- * pools if we can't block.
+ * Remapping or decrypting memory may block, allocate the memory from
+ * the atomic pools instead if we aren't allowed block.
*/
- if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev) && dma_direct_use_pool(dev, gfp))
+ if ((remap || force_dma_unencrypted(dev)) &&
+ dma_direct_use_pool(dev, gfp))
return dma_direct_alloc_from_pool(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp);
/* we always manually zero the memory once we are done */
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 7:41 fix the non-coherent coldfire dma_alloc_coherent Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] dma-direct: add depdenencies to CONFIG_DMA_GLOBAL_POOL Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09 9:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 9:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09 9:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 9:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09 10:04 ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-09 11:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 16:45 ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-09 7:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] dma-direct: add a CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ALLOC symbol Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-10-09 7:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] dma-direct: warn when coherent allocations aren't supported Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 7:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] net: fec: use dma_alloc_noncoherent for m532x Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 10:29 ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-09 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-10 14:44 ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-16 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-17 8:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-10 14:20 ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-11 5:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-11 13:09 ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-11 18:21 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-10-12 13:25 ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-12 14:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-13 1:48 ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-12 19:18 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-10-09 7:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] m68k: don't provide arch_dma_alloc for nommu/coldfire Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 8:39 ` fix the non-coherent coldfire dma_alloc_coherent Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231009074121.219686-4-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox