From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>
Cc: Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: allow ColdFire m5441x parts to run with MMU enabled
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 00:08:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72e95591-c47d-153c-693e-0bf7ad6bb535@sysam.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW-yih8Cm3TnXNHxpCOr-UnbT+NARTKiQS8zyaU3fWL+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Greg and Geert,
about my patch sent yesterday, unfortunately, i found btw
at least 1 issue: the busybox "cd" doesn't change directory :)
/ # cat /proc/vmallocinfo
0xd0006000-0xd000c000 24576 n_tty_open+0x16/0xae pages=2 vmalloc
/ # ls
bin etc lib mnt proc sbin usr
dev home media opt root sys var
/ # cd bin
/ # ls
bin etc lib mnt proc sbin usr
dev home media opt root sys var
/ # cat /proc/vm
vmallocinfo vmstat
/ # cat /proc/vm
vmallocinfo vmstat
/ # cat /proc/vmallocinfo
0xd0000000-0xd0006000 24576 unpurged vm_area
0xd0006000-0xd000c000 24576 n_tty_open+0x16/0xae pages=2 vmalloc
And after each "cd" attempt, another "unpurged" message is added.
Removing MMU cd works as expected.
On 01/09/2017 15:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au> wrote:
>> On 01/09/17 17:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
>>> wrote:
>>>> did some additional study and tests.
>>>>
>>>> Actually i cannot find any simpler patch, i just adjusted it a
>>>> bit. I believe this patch will work on your cpu with 0-based
>>>> memoryas well.
>>>> I attach it for your comments.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think your issue is caused by arch/m68k/include/asm/page_offset.h:
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_RAMBASE)
>>> #define PAGE_OFFSET_RAW CONFIG_RAMBASE
>>> #elif defined(CONFIG_SUN3)
>>> #define PAGE_OFFSET_RAW 0x0E000000
>>> #else
>>> #define PAGE_OFFSET_RAW 0x00000000
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> and arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine:
>>>
>>> if !MMU || COLDFIRE
>>>
>>> config RAMBASE
>>> hex "Address of the base of RAM"
>>> default "0"
>>>
>>> So on MC680[2346]0 with MMU (and ignoring Sun-3, which is special),
>>> PAGE_OFFSET == PAGE_OFFSET_RAW == 0.
>>>
>>> On Greg's zero-based Coldfire with MMU, CONFIG_RAMBASE is zero, and thus
>>> PAGE_OFFSET is also zero.
>>>
>>> On your board CONFIG_RAMBASE is non-zero, hence PAGE_OFFSET is also
>>> non-zero,
>>> and thus you have to compensate for that, cfr. your second patch.
>>>
>>> Does it work if you force PAGE_OFFSET_RAW to zero?
>>>
>>> If yes, we either need:
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/page_offset.h
>>> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/page_offset.h
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>> /* This handles the memory map.. */
>>>
>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_RAMBASE)
>>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_MMU)
>>> #define PAGE_OFFSET_RAW CONFIG_RAMBASE
>>> #elif defined(CONFIG_SUN3)
>>> #define PAGE_OFFSET_RAW 0x0E000000
>>>
I tested this patch, (removed mine) and kernel hangs somewhere silently at
first init, i don't have the debug enabled now, but i suspect it still
hangs at some initial "memset" since 0 area for kernel should
be allocated before access.
Isn't PAGE_OFFSET the starting area for the virtual kernel address space ?
At least so it seems to be for the famous 3G + 1G of x86.
This is what i see at boot with my patch of yesterday:
[ 0.000000] Virtual kernel memory layout:
[ 0.000000] vector : 0x40000000 - 0x40000400 ( 1 KiB)
[ 0.000000] kmap : 0xe0000000 - 0xf0000000 ( 256 MiB)
[ 0.000000] vmalloc : 0xd0000000 - 0xe0000000 ( 256 MiB)
[ 0.000000] lowmem : 0x40000000 - 0x48000000 ( 128 MiB)
[ 0.000000] .init : 0x40196000 - 0x401d8000 ( 264 KiB)
[ 0.000000] .text : 0x40001000 - 0x40131e70 (1220 KiB)
[ 0.000000] .data : 0x40131e70 - 0x40193900 ( 391 KiB)
[ 0.000000] .bss : 0x401d86d8 - 0x401ec680 ( 80 KiB)
>>> or
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine
>>> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine
>>> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ comment "RAM configuration"
>>>
>>> config RAMBASE
>>> hex "Address of the base of RAM"
>>> + depends on MMU
>>
>>
>> Did you mean "depends on !MMU" here?
>
> Sorry, yes, depends on !MMU.
>
>>> depending on whether anything else in the Coldfire code needs RAMBASE.
>>
>> There are a couple of places we depend on CONFIG_RAMBASE even
>> when running with the MMU enabled. Most importantly in setting
>> the cachable regions in arch/m68k/include/asm/m54xxacr.h.
>> So this is probably not going to work on its own.
>
> OK, as I already feared/expected...
>
>> But the first patch above should be ok. It should certainly work on
>> my 0 address base 5475 ColdFire setup. Angelo can you try that one?
>
> Right.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Regards,
Angelo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-14 23:21 Re:[PATCH] m68k: allow ColdFire m5441x parts to run with MMU enabled Angelo Dureghello
2017-07-14 23:47 ` [PATCH] " Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-09 13:04 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-09 15:32 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-10 7:06 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-12 11:17 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-14 4:16 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-17 15:02 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-20 12:44 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-20 13:26 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-21 7:15 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-21 14:58 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-21 20:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-22 0:15 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-22 0:35 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-22 1:08 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-23 7:06 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-27 0:31 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-31 22:38 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-09-01 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-01 13:21 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-09-01 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-01 22:08 ` Angelo Dureghello [this message]
2017-09-04 6:08 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-09-04 14:42 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-09-07 2:01 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-09-07 20:23 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-09-08 0:48 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-13 1:15 ` Angelo Dureghello
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-11 11:35 Greg Ungerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72e95591-c47d-153c-693e-0bf7ad6bb535@sysam.it \
--to=angelo@sysam.it \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregungerer@westnet.com.au \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox