From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
To: Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: allow ColdFire m5441x parts to run with MMU enabled
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 13:17:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4e220c9-f607-cf9a-2e63-910e745dbea9@sysam.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e1723eb-0724-7007-5b63-7d80112268a2@westnet.com.au>
Hi Greg,
On 10/08/2017 09:06, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Angelo,
>
> On 10/08/17 01:32, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> [snip]
>> sure, on this board http://sysam.it/cff_stmark2.html
>> there are 128MB of ddr2.
>>
>> External SDRAM is accessible, at least without any mmc support enabled,
>> from 0x40000000.
>>
>> I have following test config:
>>
>> GNU nano 2.8.6 File: arch/m68k/configs/stmark2_defconfig
>>
>> CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="stmark2-001"
> [snip]
>>
>>
>> I tried still yesterday a bit, but seems there is no much support for
>> earlyprintk / low level debug for this architecture.
>>
>> In case i can try with a gpio toggling routine, at least to find
>> where kernel stops.
>
> The attached patch, is a quick and dirty early console output method.
> It works for me on the m5475, should work for you "as is" on the 5441x too.
>
> It is kind of an early printk. Of course it still needs the early
> kernel boot to have succeeded before you will get anything much coming out.
> But it is worth trying.
Ok many thanks. Btw i used a __square(); function written in asm, so i am
sure i see the gpio toggling in very early stages.
>
> I am wondering if the non-0 base RAM may be a problem. I have only run
> the MMU enabled code on platforms with 0 based RAM so far. But lets see if
> the early console trace attached gives us anything before digging into that.
>
This MCU has sdram area physically mapped at 0x4000 0000 so U-Boot, to be
able to execute the kernel must load it to that location/area anyway.
But i have seen that it is not a problem, after MMU is enabled in head.S
the jump
movel #_vstart,%a0 /* jump to "virtual" space */
jmp %a0@
works fine. Since that range is not hitting anything that is maintained
physical, it can be translated into virtual without any issue.
After some hard debug, i see the execution stops at:
asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
...
setup_arch(&command_line); setup_mm.c
...
paging_init(); mm/mcfmmu.c
...
empty_zero_page = (void *) alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_SIZE);
^line 47 mcfmmu.c
Inside alloc_bootmem_pages(), execution seems to end up finally to
mm/bootmem.c and likely to alloc_bootmem_bdata().
In case i can still proceed to find the exact place where execution stops,
but i suspect in the while(1), line 545.
As a curious thing, i find in a different cf CPU code "m54xx.c"
the following:
void __init config_BSP(char *commandp, int size)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
cf_bootmem_alloc();
mmu_context_init();
#endif
Do also m5441x.c maybe need this calls ?
Would be very nice to have MMU working. Strangely, i don't see any
board_config with it enabled. Was it ever tested on some Coldfire ?
Waiting your suggestion on how to proceed.
Regards,
Angelo Dureghello
> Regards
> Greg
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-12 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-14 23:21 Re:[PATCH] m68k: allow ColdFire m5441x parts to run with MMU enabled Angelo Dureghello
2017-07-14 23:47 ` [PATCH] " Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-09 13:04 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-09 15:32 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-10 7:06 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-12 11:17 ` Angelo Dureghello [this message]
2017-08-14 4:16 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-17 15:02 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-20 12:44 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-20 13:26 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-21 7:15 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-21 14:58 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-21 20:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-22 0:15 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-22 0:35 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-22 1:08 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-23 7:06 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-27 0:31 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-08-31 22:38 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-09-01 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-01 13:21 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-09-01 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-01 22:08 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-09-04 6:08 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-09-04 14:42 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-09-07 2:01 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-09-07 20:23 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-09-08 0:48 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-08-13 1:15 ` Angelo Dureghello
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-11 11:35 Greg Ungerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4e220c9-f607-cf9a-2e63-910e745dbea9@sysam.it \
--to=angelo@sysam.it \
--cc=gregungerer@westnet.com.au \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox