* [PATCH] mk68k: Fix broken THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
@ 2024-02-28 8:58 Dawei Li
2024-02-28 9:11 ` Jiri Slaby
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dawei Li @ 2024-02-28 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: geert; +Cc: gerg, linux-m68k, linux-kernel, set_pte_at, Dawei Li, stable
Current THREAD_SIZE_ORDER implementation for m68k is incorrect, fix it
by ilog2().
Fixes: cddafa3500fd ("m68k/m68knommu: merge MMU and non-MMU thread_info.h")
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 31be2ad999ca..50faecd6fc5f 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
#else
#define THREAD_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
#endif
-#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ((THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) - 1)
+
+#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ilog2(THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE)
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mk68k: Fix broken THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
2024-02-28 8:58 [PATCH] mk68k: Fix broken THREAD_SIZE_ORDER Dawei Li
@ 2024-02-28 9:11 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-02-28 9:33 ` Dawei Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2024-02-28 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dawei Li, geert; +Cc: gerg, linux-m68k, linux-kernel, set_pte_at, stable
On 28. 02. 24, 9:58, Dawei Li wrote:
> Current THREAD_SIZE_ORDER implementation for m68k is incorrect, fix it
> by ilog2().
This is not a good commit log. Incorrect in what way and why is the
fixed version correct? And what is affected? Note you're referring to a
change which was done 14 years ago. It definitely must not be that
incorrect (for everybody).
> Fixes: cddafa3500fd ("m68k/m68knommu: merge MMU and non-MMU thread_info.h")
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 31be2ad999ca..50faecd6fc5f 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
> #else
> #define THREAD_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> #endif
> -#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ((THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) - 1)
> +
> +#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ilog2(THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE)
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
--
js
suse labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mk68k: Fix broken THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
2024-02-28 9:11 ` Jiri Slaby
@ 2024-02-28 9:33 ` Dawei Li
2024-02-28 10:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dawei Li @ 2024-02-28 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Slaby; +Cc: geert, gerg, linux-m68k, linux-kernel, set_pte_at, stable
Hi Jiri,
Thanks for quick review.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:11:05AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 28. 02. 24, 9:58, Dawei Li wrote:
> > Current THREAD_SIZE_ORDER implementation for m68k is incorrect, fix it
> > by ilog2().
>
> This is not a good commit log. Incorrect in what way and why is the fixed
Agreed.
> version correct? And what is affected? Note you're referring to a change
> which was done 14 years ago. It definitely must not be that incorrect (for
> everybody).
It's 'right' just for current PAGE_SIZE & THREAD_SIZE configs:
// arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
#if PAGE_SHIFT < 13
#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
#define THREAD_SIZE 4096
#else
#define THREAD_SIZE 8192
#endif
#else
#define THREAD_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
#endif
#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ((THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) - 1)
// arch/m68k/include/asm/page.h
#if defined(CONFIG_SUN3) || defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
#define PAGE_SHIFT 13
#else
#define PAGE_SHIFT 12
#endif
#define PAGE_SIZE (_AC(1, UL) << PAGE_SHIFT)
#define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
#define PAGE_OFFSET (PAGE_OFFSET_RAW)
But it's incorrect in generic/mathematical way.
Thanks,
Dawei
>
> > Fixes: cddafa3500fd ("m68k/m68knommu: merge MMU and non-MMU thread_info.h")
> > Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > index 31be2ad999ca..50faecd6fc5f 100644
> > --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
> > #else
> > #define THREAD_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> > #endif
> > -#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ((THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) - 1)
> > +
> > +#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ilog2(THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE)
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> --
> js
> suse labs
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mk68k: Fix broken THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
2024-02-28 9:33 ` Dawei Li
@ 2024-02-28 10:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2024-02-28 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dawei Li; +Cc: Jiri Slaby, gerg, linux-m68k, linux-kernel, set_pte_at, stable
Hi Dawei,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:34 AM Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:11:05AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 28. 02. 24, 9:58, Dawei Li wrote:
> > > Current THREAD_SIZE_ORDER implementation for m68k is incorrect, fix it
> > > by ilog2().
> >
> > This is not a good commit log. Incorrect in what way and why is the fixed
>
> Agreed.
>
> > version correct? And what is affected? Note you're referring to a change
> > which was done 14 years ago. It definitely must not be that incorrect (for
> > everybody).
>
> It's 'right' just for current PAGE_SIZE & THREAD_SIZE configs:
>
> // arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h
> #if PAGE_SHIFT < 13
> #ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
> #define THREAD_SIZE 4096
> #else
> #define THREAD_SIZE 8192
> #endif
> #else
> #define THREAD_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> #endif
> #define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ((THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) - 1)
Indeed. The only supported values for THREAD_SIZE_ORDER on m68k are
0 and 1.
> But it's incorrect in generic/mathematical way.
True. But does it matter much?
I.e. do you plan to add support for larger values of THREAD_SIZE?
What about changing the #ifdeffery to set THREAD_SIZE_ORDER to an
explicit value, and calculating THREAD_SIZE from THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
instead?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-28 10:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-28 8:58 [PATCH] mk68k: Fix broken THREAD_SIZE_ORDER Dawei Li
2024-02-28 9:11 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-02-28 9:33 ` Dawei Li
2024-02-28 10:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox