public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Does anyone use Appletalk?
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 15:27:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79b7f88e3dd6536fe69c63ed3b4cc1f2c551ce8d.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e3e52a48ba9cc0109a98cf4c5371c3f80c4b4cc.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>

On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 13:26 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Geert,
> 
> On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 13:19 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Isn't that a bit late?
> > 
> > It can always be reverted...
> 
> Sure, but I'd rather see such discussions before merging the removal
> patch. Best would have been to reach out to the netatalk project, for
> example and ask [1]. They just released version 3.1.18 of the
> netatalk
> server in October 2023.
> 
> It's an incredibly cool project because it allows you to replace the
> expensive Apple TimeMachine hardware with a cheap Raspberry Pi ;-).

But... Time Machine debuted with 10.5 and AppleTalk got removed in
10.6; did the actual TimeCapsules ever support AppleTalk, or were they
always TCP/IP-based?

(also TimeMachine-capable Airport Extremes [A1354] are like $15 on
eBay; that's cheaper than a Raspberry Pi)

This patch only removes the Linux-side ipddp driver (eg MacIP) so if
Time Capsules never supported AppleTalk, this patch is unrelated to
TimeMachine.

What this patch *may* break is Linux as a MacIP gateway, allowing
AppleTalk-only machines to talk TCP/IP to systems. But that's like
what, the 128/512/Plus and PowerBook Duo/1xx? Everything else had a
PDS/NuBus slot or onboard Ethernet and could do native
MacTCP/OpenTransport...

Dan


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-01 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-01 10:23 Does anyone use Appletalk? Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-11-01 10:54 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-11-01 12:19   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-11-01 12:26     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-11-01 20:27       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2023-11-01 22:29         ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-02  2:13           ` Finn Thain
2023-11-02  8:55             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-11-01 22:33         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79b7f88e3dd6536fe69c63ed3b4cc1f2c551ce8d.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox