From: fthain@telegraphics.com.au
To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>
Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:38:11 +1000 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909122039160.6219@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA2684E.1080009@codesourcery.com>
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Finn Thain wrote:
> ...
>
> > I understand that the current GCC (4.4) lacks the necessary patches,
> > and 4.5 is still uncooked (and that's a scary prospect). Can someone
> > confirm that this is the necessary patch for 4.4:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01024.html
>
> I think GCC 4.4 should be good enough.
I tried patching 4.4.1 and the patch was rejected. It expects
m68k_legitimize_address() to have been declared and defined, but that
routine isn't in gcc-4.4.
So, I edited the patch (see diff below). What bothers me is that this
removes the call to the new m68k_tls_symbol_p() routine:
../../gcc-4.4.1/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.c: At top level:
../../gcc-4.4.1/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.c:2553: warning: 'm68k_tls_symbol_p' defined but not used
The compiler appears to work, but I haven't run any executable it produced
as yet. When we get eglibc-2.10 I plan to run the testsuites on '040
hardware, which is going to take a long time to complete. It would be nice
to know in advance whether this naive attempt at a backport is likely to
work or not (?)
Finn
--- gcc-m68k-support-for-tls.patch 2009-09-13 13:16:03.475546800 +1000
+++ gcc-m68k-support-for-tls-backport.patch 2009-09-13 13:16:03.475546800 +1000
@@ -574,12 +574,11 @@
enum reg_class regno_reg_class[] =
{
-@@ -143,11 +144,13 @@ static tree m68k_handle_fndecl_attribute
+@@ -143,10 +144,12 @@ static tree m68k_handle_fndecl_attribute
static void m68k_compute_frame_layout (void);
static bool m68k_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool interrupt_handler);
static bool m68k_ok_for_sibcall_p (tree, tree);
+static bool m68k_tls_symbol_p (rtx);
- static rtx m68k_legitimize_address (rtx, rtx, enum machine_mode);
static bool m68k_rtx_costs (rtx, int, int, int *, bool);
#if M68K_HONOR_TARGET_STRICT_ALIGNMENT
static bool m68k_return_in_memory (const_tree, const_tree);
@@ -613,16 +612,6 @@
&& crtl->uses_pic_offset_table)
insn = emit_insn (gen_load_got (pic_offset_table_rtx));
}
-@@ -1431,6 +1441,9 @@ m68k_legitimize_sibcall_address (rtx x)
- rtx
- m68k_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx oldx, enum machine_mode mode)
- {
-+ if (m68k_tls_symbol_p (x))
-+ return m68k_legitimize_tls_address (x);
-+
- if (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS)
- {
- int ch = (x) != (oldx);
@@ -1849,7 +1862,7 @@ m68k_illegitimate_symbolic_constant_p (r
&& !offset_within_block_p (base, INTVAL (offset)))
return true;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-13 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 3:28 bogl: don't know screen type 1 mike
2009-08-31 12:06 ` Stephen R Marenka
2009-08-31 12:58 ` mike
2009-08-31 22:11 ` mike
2009-08-31 22:16 ` mike
2009-09-01 15:17 ` Stephen R Marenka
2009-09-03 1:16 ` mike
2009-09-03 1:22 ` mike
2009-09-03 9:50 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-09-03 16:41 ` mike
2009-09-11 20:01 ` Kolbjørn Barmen
2009-09-11 20:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-09-12 10:24 ` fthain
2009-09-04 15:43 ` toolchain, was " Finn Thain
2009-09-05 1:08 ` Stephen R Marenka
2009-09-05 1:57 ` mike
2009-09-05 2:17 ` mike
2009-09-05 7:08 ` Petr Stehlik
2009-09-05 8:49 ` Ingo Jürgensmann
2009-09-06 5:07 ` Finn Thain
2009-09-05 13:31 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-09-05 16:00 ` mike
2009-09-06 10:00 ` Finn Thain
2009-09-06 2:37 ` toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-06 23:09 ` toolchain Stephen R Marenka
2009-09-06 5:20 ` toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-08 13:07 ` toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-13 3:38 ` fthain [this message]
2009-09-13 5:01 ` toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1 Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-09-14 10:37 ` fthain
2009-09-22 5:11 ` mike
2009-09-22 13:09 ` benchmarks, was Re: toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-22 14:51 ` mike
2009-09-22 15:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-09-28 14:00 ` toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1 mike
2009-09-28 14:26 ` debian installation Finn Thain
2009-09-28 14:44 ` mike
2009-09-29 9:45 ` mike
2009-09-29 22:23 ` Rolf Anders
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.0909122039160.6219@nippy.intranet \
--to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=debian-68k@lists.debian.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxim@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox