From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 01:43:14 +1000 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.0909050045330.383@silk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901151747.GB27514@marenka.net>
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:16:27AM +0200, mike wrote:
> > Btw, i noticed an error
> > http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/build_nativehd.log
> > E: Couldn't find package libnss-dns-udeb
> > make[2]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-nativehd-stamp] Error 100
> > make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2
> > make: *** [build_nativehd] Error 2
>
> Yep. debian-installer dailies are now *dead* until we get a modern libc
> working.
I wonder whether there are debian source packages for binutils, gcc and
glibc having TLS/NPTL support for m68k.
The patches posted to the binutils mailing list are incomplete. The
binutils patch at
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/tls/
is broken according to Kolla:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2009/07/msg00001.html
But in that post (June 28) Maxim recommends using mainline binutils, and
since then we have HJL binutils-2.19.51.0.14 released, "...based on
binutils 2009 0722 in CVS on sourceware.org..." So I guess I should start
there.
I understand that the current GCC (4.4) lacks the necessary patches, and
4.5 is still uncooked (and that's a scary prospect). Can someone confirm
that this is the necessary patch for 4.4:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01024.html
Presumably not this one?
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/tls/gcc_patch2
(and gcc_patch1 is clearly broken... perhaps it was actually the same
thing before being mangled... Stephen, I don't think this "/tls" directory
is helping any.)
Or perhaps there is a known-good gcc 4.5 snapshot (FWIW, I'd much rather
patch a debian compiler instead, which means 4.4 or preferably older.)
As for eglibc, there are a number of branches listed here,
http://www.eglibc.org/repository
The question is, which branch, snapshot or release might meet be suitable?
With this information, I could attempt to build a toolchain from upstream
sources, or figure out whether or not the debian archive has the necessary
source packages...
Finn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 3:28 bogl: don't know screen type 1 mike
2009-08-31 12:06 ` Stephen R Marenka
2009-08-31 12:58 ` mike
2009-08-31 22:11 ` mike
2009-08-31 22:16 ` mike
2009-09-01 15:17 ` Stephen R Marenka
2009-09-03 1:16 ` mike
2009-09-03 1:22 ` mike
2009-09-03 9:50 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-09-03 16:41 ` mike
2009-09-11 20:01 ` Kolbjørn Barmen
2009-09-11 20:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-09-12 10:24 ` fthain
2009-09-04 15:43 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2009-09-05 1:08 ` toolchain, was " Stephen R Marenka
2009-09-05 1:57 ` mike
2009-09-05 2:17 ` mike
2009-09-05 7:08 ` Petr Stehlik
2009-09-05 8:49 ` Ingo Jürgensmann
2009-09-06 5:07 ` Finn Thain
2009-09-05 13:31 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-09-05 16:00 ` mike
2009-09-06 10:00 ` Finn Thain
2009-09-06 2:37 ` toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-06 23:09 ` toolchain Stephen R Marenka
2009-09-06 5:20 ` toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-08 13:07 ` toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-13 3:38 ` toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1 fthain
2009-09-13 5:01 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-09-14 10:37 ` fthain
2009-09-22 5:11 ` mike
2009-09-22 13:09 ` benchmarks, was Re: toolchain Finn Thain
2009-09-22 14:51 ` mike
2009-09-22 15:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-09-28 14:00 ` toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1 mike
2009-09-28 14:26 ` debian installation Finn Thain
2009-09-28 14:44 ` mike
2009-09-29 9:45 ` mike
2009-09-29 22:23 ` Rolf Anders
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.OSX.2.00.0909050045330.383@silk.local \
--to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=debian-68k@lists.debian.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@marenka.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox