From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>, linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] man/man7/unix.7: Explain Abstract UDS scoping to the network namespace
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 22:11:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026.dc0f52217f35@gnoack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atxDa5S8RPeZTm7C@google.com>
Hello! Thanks for the review!
On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 05:39:52AM +0000, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 23:07:56 +0200, Günther Noack wrote:
> > Point out that Abstract Unix Domain Sockets are visible within the
> > current network namespace, unlike Named Unix Domain Sockets, where the
>
> s/Named/pathname/.
>
> pathname, unnamed, abstract are used in Address format section.
Thanks, fixed.
> > remote socket is looked up through the mount namespace.
> >
> > To avoid confusion, remove the word "namespace" from the subsequent
> > paragraph, where it is used in a more colloquial form (there is no
> > abstract socket namespace in the sense of namespaces(7)).
>
> The change still uses "abstract socket namespace".
In the "Abstract Sockets" section, the word "namespace" is not used
any more in the general sense, but only in the sense of a
setns(2)/namespaces(7) namespace.
There are some places in the man page where the word "namespace" is
still used colloquially, but these are not in the vicinity of this
change and feel less prone to confusion. Do you think I should update
these all in the same commit?
> > This is already described in network_namespaces(7) as well, but might
> > be mentionworthy here too.
> >
> > The lookup of Abtract addresses happens in __unix_find_socket_byname()
> > in linux.git net/unix/af_unix.c, where it is looked up in the network
> > namespace (struct net *net) in a hash table in that namespace:
> >
> > sk_for_each(s, &net->unx.table.buckets[hash]) {
> > // ...
> > }
> >
> > Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > Verified in code
> >
> > man/man7/unix.7 | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/man/man7/unix.7 b/man/man7/unix.7
> > index 4c46b54206a5..232fdbf4c3cd 100644
> > --- a/man/man7/unix.7
> > +++ b/man/man7/unix.7
> > @@ -257,7 +257,17 @@ has no effect on the accessibility of the socket.
> > Abstract sockets automatically disappear when all open references
> > to the socket are closed.
> > .P
> > -The abstract socket namespace is a nonportable Linux extension.
> > +Each network namespace has its own abstract socket namespace (see
> > +.BR network_namespaces (7)):
>
> Remove this sentence and...
>
>
> > +a socket can connect or send to an abstract address
> > +only if the socket bound to that address
> > +is in the same network namespace.
>
> add "(see network_namespaces (7))" here.
Good idea, that's shorter.
> > +In contrast,
> > +pathname sockets are not confined to a network namespace;
> > +they can be reached from any network namespace
> > +in which the socket file is accessible.
> > +.P
> > +Abstract sockets are a nonportable Linux extension.
> > .\"
> > .SS Socket options
> > For historical reasons, these socket options are specified with a
> > --
> > 2.56.0
> >
Thanks,
–Günther
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 21:07 [PATCH 0/8] {unix,socket,bind}.7: General Unix Domain Socket fixes Günther Noack
2026-10-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] man/man7/socket.7: SO_PEEK_OFF: This option is no longer specific to unix(7) Günther Noack
2026-10-23 18:20 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-10-26 20:48 ` Günther Noack
2026-10-24 5:27 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] man/man7/unix.7: SO_PEERCRED: Also works for SOCK_SEQPACKET Günther Noack
2026-10-24 5:28 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] man/man7/unix.7: SIOCINQ: Document behavior " Günther Noack
2026-10-24 5:34 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-26 20:59 ` Günther Noack
2026-10-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] man/man7/unix.7: Explain Abstract UDS scoping to the network namespace Günther Noack
2026-10-24 5:39 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-26 21:11 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2026-10-27 5:12 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-27 7:58 ` Günther Noack
2026-10-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] man/man7/unix.7: SOCK_RAW is accepted as an alias for SOCK_DGRAM Günther Noack
2026-10-24 5:44 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-26 21:13 ` Günther Noack
2026-10-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] man/man7/unix.7: ERRORS: EPROTONOSUPPORT: Protocol 0 is also accepted Günther Noack
2026-10-24 5:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-26 21:15 ` Günther Noack
2026-10-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] man/man2/bind.2: ERRORS: EACCES: Write permission on the directory is required Günther Noack
2026-10-24 5:56 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-24 5:58 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-26 21:16 ` Günther Noack
2026-10-21 21:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] man/man7/unix.7: ERRORS: Document EACCES, EAGAIN, EMSGSIZE, ENOSPC, and EPERM Günther Noack
2026-10-24 6:03 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-26 21:27 ` Günther Noack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026.dc0f52217f35@gnoack.org \
--to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox