Linux Manual Pages development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "astian" <astian@memeware.net>
To: "Alejandro Colomar" <alx@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-man" <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: ioperm(2): confusing terminology
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:00:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLDOCNQUCW9N.3GGL01BMV0HNG@memeware.net> (raw)

ioperm(2) says:

  int ioperm(unsigned long from, unsigned long num, int turn_on);

  ioperm() sets the port access permission bits for the calling thread
  for num bits starting from port address from.  If turn_on is nonzero,
  then permission for the specified bits is enabled; otherwise it is
  disabled. [...]

The use of "bits" here is confusing/sloppy.

ioperm is supposed to enable or disable permission to access IO ports
for the calling thread.  In this API, the "permission bit" (singular) is
really "turn_on": 0 to disable access, non-zero to enable.  However this
description refers also "num bits starting from port address from" and
"the specified bits".  That seems to suggest that IO ports somehow refer
to "bits" and this API controls access permission to them, which is
bewildering.

Searching around I have seen that other versions of this manpage used to
say "bytes" instead of "bits", which is only slightly less bewildering.
Ports/addresses in the IO space refer neither to bits nor to bytes per
se, they are an abstract interface, like a syscall number/index.
(Architecturally, in some cases, these indices may in fact map to
processor registers which may in fact be portions of a contiguous
internal memory, so in some cases one could correctly say that the ports
refer to "bytes" in such memory, but this is obviously all very
low-level and microarchitecture-specific.  I think being aware of such
details actually makes this description more confusing.)

Apparently the reason for this confusing description is that for Linux
ioperm is a syscall and the kernel implements this syscall using a
bitmap with 1 bit (permitted/denied) for each port, in a contiguous
sequence.  See ksys_ioperm in "arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c".

Thus "num bits starting from port address from" actually refers to the
bits of that bitmap: the bits [from, from+num) are set according to
turn_on.

This kind of implicit reference to implementation details is wicked.

Suggested change:

  ioperm() sets the calling thread's access permission for num ports
  starting from port address from.  If turn_on is nonzero, then
  permission for the specified ports is enabled; otherwise it is
  disabled. [...]

PS: Oh, also, maybe the title should say "set input/output port
permissions" instead of "set port input/output permissions".

             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-12 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-12 22:00 astian [this message]
2026-09-12 22:24 ` ioperm(2): confusing terminology Alejandro Colomar
2026-09-12 22:48   ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-09-13  6:29   ` astian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DLDOCNQUCW9N.3GGL01BMV0HNG@memeware.net \
    --to=astian@memeware.net \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox