* Issue in man page puts.3 @ 2025-08-24 14:48 Helge Kreutzmann 2025-08-24 19:17 ` Alejandro Colomar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Helge Kreutzmann @ 2025-08-24 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: alx; +Cc: mario.blaettermann, linux-man Without further ado, the following was found: Issue 1: I<putchar(c)> → B<putchar(>I<c>B<)> Issue 2: I<putc(c,\\ stdout)> → B<putc(>I<c>B<, >I<stdout>B<)> "I<putchar(c)> is equivalent to I<putc(c,\\ stdout)>." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue in man page puts.3 2025-08-24 14:48 Issue in man page puts.3 Helge Kreutzmann @ 2025-08-24 19:17 ` Alejandro Colomar 2025-08-25 16:05 ` Helge Kreutzmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Colomar @ 2025-08-24 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Helge Kreutzmann; +Cc: mario.blaettermann, linux-man [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 528 bytes --] Hi Helge, On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 02:48:48PM +0000, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Without further ado, the following was found: > > Issue 1: I<putchar(c)> → B<putchar(>I<c>B<)> > Issue 2: I<putc(c,\\ stdout)> → B<putc(>I<c>B<, >I<stdout>B<)> > > "I<putchar(c)> is equivalent to I<putc(c,\\ stdout)>." These are correct. See man-pages(7): Expressions, if not written on a separate indented line, should be specified in italics. Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue in man page puts.3 2025-08-24 19:17 ` Alejandro Colomar @ 2025-08-25 16:05 ` Helge Kreutzmann 2025-08-25 19:03 ` Alejandro Colomar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Helge Kreutzmann @ 2025-08-25 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alejandro Colomar; +Cc: mario.blaettermann, linux-man [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1511 bytes --] Am Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 09:17:17PM +0200 schrieb Alejandro Colomar: > Hi Helge, > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 02:48:48PM +0000, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Without further ado, the following was found: > > > > Issue 1: I<putchar(c)> → B<putchar(>I<c>B<)> > > Issue 2: I<putc(c,\\ stdout)> → B<putc(>I<c>B<, >I<stdout>B<)> > > > > "I<putchar(c)> is equivalent to I<putc(c,\\ stdout)>." > > These are correct. See man-pages(7): > > Expressions, if not written on a separate indented line, > should be specified in italics. Thanks for the pointer. I now see that sentence, but it doesn't make sense. I believed the whole idea of this formatting was to give meaning to the content, e.g. put variables in italices and "fixed" strings in bold. Rules like these also make translations harder, because translators are not programmers, and guides like layed out in the previous paragraphs really helped a lot doing good translations. I guess at least for Linux man pages I stop reporting formatting issues, as the rules are much more complex than I would like them to be / than I tought. Sorry thus for the many (incorrect) reports. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue in man page puts.3 2025-08-25 16:05 ` Helge Kreutzmann @ 2025-08-25 19:03 ` Alejandro Colomar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Colomar @ 2025-08-25 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Helge Kreutzmann; +Cc: mario.blaettermann, linux-man [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1788 bytes --] Hi Helge, On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:05:55PM +0000, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Am Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 09:17:17PM +0200 schrieb Alejandro Colomar: > > Hi Helge, > > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 02:48:48PM +0000, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > Without further ado, the following was found: > > > > > > Issue 1: I<putchar(c)> → B<putchar(>I<c>B<)> > > > Issue 2: I<putc(c,\\ stdout)> → B<putc(>I<c>B<, >I<stdout>B<)> > > > > > > "I<putchar(c)> is equivalent to I<putc(c,\\ stdout)>." > > > > These are correct. See man-pages(7): > > > > Expressions, if not written on a separate indented line, > > should be specified in italics. > > Thanks for the pointer. I now see that sentence, but it doesn't make > sense. I believed the whole idea of this formatting was to give > meaning to the content, e.g. put variables in italices and "fixed" > strings in bold. In general, I try to avoid these inlined expressions, and replace them by indented ones, which don't go in italics (they have no formatting; just monospaced). I agree with the problem you mentioned, and think that the solution is to try to avoid inlined expressions as much as is sensible to do. > Rules like these also make translations harder, because translators > are not programmers, and guides like layed out in the previous > paragraphs really helped a lot doing good translations. > > I guess at least for Linux man pages I stop reporting formatting > issues, as the rules are much more complex than I would like them to > be / than I tought. No problem; this reports help realize when something is confusing for readers. Please continue reporting issues if you don't understand something. Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-25 19:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-08-24 14:48 Issue in man page puts.3 Helge Kreutzmann 2025-08-24 19:17 ` Alejandro Colomar 2025-08-25 16:05 ` Helge Kreutzmann 2025-08-25 19:03 ` Alejandro Colomar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox