Re: Update VIP to videobuf2 and control framework

[Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@gmail.com>]

In data mercoledì 1 agosto 2012 07:04:18, Jonathan Corbet ha scritto:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:41:56 +0200
> 
> Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > > The second patch adds a new memory allocator for the videobuf2. I
> > > name it videobuf2-dma-streaming but I think "streaming" is not
> > > the best choice, so suggestions are welcome. My inspiration for
> > > this buffer come from videobuf-dma-contig (cached) version. After
> > > I made this buffer I found the videobuf2-dma-nc made by Jonathan
> > > Corbet and I improve the allocator with some suggestions
> > > (http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7441/). The VIP doesn't work
> > > with videobu2-dma-contig and I think this solution is easier the
> > > sg.> 
> > I leave this to the vb2 experts. It's not obvious to me why we would
> > need a fourth memory allocator.
> 
> I first wrote my version after observing that performance dropped by a
> factor of three on the OLPC XO 1.75 when using contiguous, coherent
> memory.  If the architecture needs to turn off caching, things really
> slow down, to the point that it's unusable.  There's no real reason
> why a V4L2 device shouldn't be able to use streaming mappings in this
> situation; it performs better and doesn't eat into the limited
> amounts of coherent DMA space available on some systems.
> 
> I never got my version into a mergeable state only because I finally
> figured out how to bludgeon the hardware into doing s/g DMA and didn't
> need it anymore.  But I think it's a worthwhile functionality to
> have, and, with CMA, it could be the preferred mode for a number of
> devices.
> 
> jon

I think that the memory allocator is the most questionable patch, but if 
there are not any other comments I will send my three patches for the 
inclusion. It is summer, time for vacation, so I'll wait for another 
week or two for critical comments and then I will send patches.


-- 
Federico Vaga