Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: media: qcom,x1e80100-camss: Sort interconnects alphabetically

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 24/06/2025 15:29, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 6/24/25 15:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/06/2025 13:38, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> On 6/24/25 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 24/06/2025 11:42, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>>> Sort the entries of interconnect and interconnect-names lists in the
>>>>> alphabetical order of values in the latter property.
>>>>
>>>> We do not sort these entries alphabetically and you did not explain why
>>>> you are doing this.
>>>
>>> I did it, because I assume that the preference is to sort all named
>>> values alphanumerically.
>>
>> Where is such preference documented?
> 
> There is no such preference documented, as I stated it was my assumption
> and it was based on your firm insistance to apply a particular sorting
> order for regs, clocks and interrupts properties. Apparently you are

Hm? And the rule is by name? I don't think I ever expressed that or
insisted on some sorting by name. During previous talks on camss
numerous times you ignored the ONLY rule of sorting I was insisting:
keep the same as all other devices. That was the one and only rule.

> fine with out of the same sort order for 'interconnects' values, the
> criteria of picked properties remains unclear for me.

I don't understand why it is unclear. That time with Bryan you both
received VERY CLEAR feedback from me: there is no such rule of sorting
any values. Yet you were pushing the discussion and patchset like there
was something.


Best regards,
Krzysztof