Re: [DTV Update] Re: Änderung der Sendefrequenzen bei KabelBW

[Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>]

Pushed to the dtv-scan-tables tree. A package should be generated thanks 
to mauro soon, so if packagers download tomorrow, or pull from git now, 
they have the new version.

On 07/03/13 20:32, Dirk Ritter wrote:
> Hello Oliver! :-)
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.07.2013, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Oliver Schinagl:
>
>>> Ich habe in der Datei in dieser Datei die einzig relevante Zeile von "C
>>> 113000000 6900000 NONE QAM64" auf "C 114000000 6900000 NONE QAM256" korrigieren
>>> müssen, so dass der Scan wieder geklappt hat.
>> It looks like they changed frequencies.
>
> Yes.
>
>>   Their site confirms that a big
>> changeover happened in June. I have staged this commit and will push it
>> tomorrow unless anybody objects, Dirk, can you confirm/deny this being
>> correct?
>
> It is correct. I got an e-mail from Martin Klar who lives
> in a KabelBW area that got the change earlier than mine.
> I did wait for the change and can positively confirm it.
> Based on data available (I did try to make sense of his
> change beforehand) and based on testing done using Kaffeine
> just after KabelBW changed it in Stuttgart.
>
>> I already have it in my private repo [0]
>
> Life took it's toll, so I didn't manage to forward this.
> Martin already tried without any luck and that's why he
> contacted me so that I could try. It was a rather difficult
> story back then I first cooked it up since there was
> disagreement between documents floating around and actual
> frequencies used and as a result of further difficulties
> with different tables for different service levels we
> concluded it would be best to just have one frequency,
> especially since that worked across both levels, i.e. for
> both fully and partly populated network areas within KabelBW.
>
> I guess Martin would love to see the file changed as he
> did, see attachment... ;-)
>
> BTW - what about Kaffeeine? How do they handle it? I
> just changed it locally and it works, but I don't think
> they did update it either.
They probably maintain their own (bad).

>
> Hopefully, this will propagate fast...
>
> Cheers!
> Dirk
>
oliver