Linux Media Controller development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Camera & ISP at Linux Plumbers Conference
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:08:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e666dbd1-7223-4c6e-b47e-e0023a5d7ca9@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00cc46b2-0729-46d3-8e3b-ea717ec1675e@kernel.org>

Hi,

On 17-Sep-26 15:47, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 15/09/2026 00:38, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> We can consider scheduling a third topic. Proposals are welcome.
> 
> From my LPC submission:
> 
> "Should offline ISPs be implemented in drm/accel"
> 
> Where does an offline Camera ISP belong in video4linux or in DRM and why ?
> 
> There are two main types of ISP - inline and offline. An inline ISP takes sensor input directly and produces some kind of processed image on the output. This is a natural fit for v4l2.
> 
> An offline ISP takes a memory buffer given to it and processes that buffer against supplied parameters. This model can be implemented as a video4linux m2m device but it could also be implemented as a DRM device and included in the DAG.
> 
> Taking Qualcomm SoCs as an example the Camera hardware provides two types of ISP. An inline processing engine IFE and an offline processing engine based on firmware ICP/HFI.

Note that one some Qualcomm SoCs the inline-engine can be switched to
offline mode and then run as a M2M ISP. Also the offline ISPs and
inline ISPs often have similar processing-blocks with similar or
identical parameters.

I do not think that splitting this over 2 subsystems is helpful and will
lead to a lot of duplication of efforts related to ISPs.

> A use-case emerges to implement the inline ISP in v4l2 and the offline in drm/accel.
> > Some tension with this design would exist as user-space would have to be involved to update ISP parameters and process statistics. Another tension is including a firmware based system in dma-fencing including watchdogging and resetting if required.
> 
> There are clear benefits to having a loop of NPU/DSP to Offline ISP to Display that drm/accel seems to offer some interesting solutions to.

This sounds to me like we need a way to better integrate drm and v4l2
subsystems. Other areas like hw-video-decoders might benefit from
having better integration there too.

Regards,

Hans




  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <UzpC1s2YnBtZIaRCab_Y8AbCecyauDUO4OC7Nhd1-h4TE21aLSghbwDuOKgdwJQugvPMjM4foPHuL-UKnBLD6A==@protonmail.internalid>
2026-09-14 23:38 ` [ANNOUNCEMENT] Camera & ISP at Linux Plumbers Conference Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-17 13:47   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-18  8:08     ` johannes.goede [this message]
2026-09-18  9:18     ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-19 21:45       ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-19 22:29         ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-21 11:52           ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-21 16:02             ` Nicolas Dufresne
2026-09-27  9:01   ` johannes.goede
2026-09-27  9:04   ` johannes.goede
2026-09-30 11:18   ` Stefan Klug
2026-09-30 22:01     ` Conor Dooley
2026-10-02 16:14       ` Stefan Klug
2026-10-03 14:56         ` Loic Poulain
2026-10-01 15:15     ` johannes.goede
2026-10-01 20:55       ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-10-02  6:56         ` Sakari Ailus
2026-10-02 18:31           ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-10-06 10:03             ` Sakari Ailus
     [not found]   ` <2e1d628f-8183-4446-9500-9886561f320b@mm-sol.com>
2026-09-30 23:23     ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-10-06  6:30       ` Gjorgji Rosikopulos
2026-10-01  6:19   ` Rishikesh Donadkar
2026-10-01 21:08     ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e666dbd1-7223-4c6e-b47e-e0023a5d7ca9@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=bod@kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox