From: <stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: wsd_upstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
kuohong.wang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: Synchronize request queue PM status only on successful resume
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 14:53:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1546498395-4184-3-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546498395-4184-1-git-send-email-stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
The commit 356fd2663cff ("scsi: Set request queue runtime PM status
back to active on resume") fixed up the inconsistent RPM status between
request queue and device. However changing request queue RPM status
shall be done only on successful resume, otherwise status may be still
inconsistent as below,
Request queue: RPM_ACTIVE
Device: RPM_SUSPENDED
This ends up soft lockup because requests can be submitted to
underlying devices but those devices and their required resource
are not resumed.
Fixes: 356fd2663cff ("scsi: Set request queue runtime PM status
back to active on resume")
Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c
index a2b4179bfdf7..7639df91b110 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c
@@ -80,8 +80,22 @@ static int scsi_dev_type_resume(struct device *dev,
if (err == 0) {
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
- pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+ err = pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+
+ /*
+ * Forcibly set runtime PM status of request queue to "active"
+ * to make sure we can again get requests from the queue
+ * (see also blk_pm_peek_request()).
+ *
+ * The resume hook will correct runtime PM status of the disk.
+ */
+ if (!err && scsi_is_sdev_device(dev)) {
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
+
+ if (sdev->request_queue->dev)
+ blk_set_runtime_active(sdev->request_queue);
+ }
}
return err;
@@ -140,16 +154,6 @@ static int scsi_bus_resume_common(struct device *dev,
else
fn = NULL;
- /*
- * Forcibly set runtime PM status of request queue to "active" to
- * make sure we can again get requests from the queue (see also
- * blk_pm_peek_request()).
- *
- * The resume hook will correct runtime PM status of the disk.
- */
- if (scsi_is_sdev_device(dev) && pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
- blk_set_runtime_active(to_scsi_device(dev)->request_queue);
-
if (fn) {
async_schedule_domain(fn, dev, &scsi_sd_pm_domain);
--
2.18.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-03 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-03 6:53 [PATCH v2] scsi: Synchronize request queue PM status only on successful resume stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w
[not found] ` <1546498395-4184-1-git-send-email-stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-03 6:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w
2019-01-03 6:53 ` stanley.chu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w [this message]
2019-01-03 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Mika Westerberg
2019-01-03 9:06 ` Stanley Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1546498395-4184-3-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--to=stanley.chu-nus5lvnupcjwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kuohong.wang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox