From: xiangsheng.hou <xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: <broonie@kernel.org>, <benliang.zhao@mediatek.com>,
<dandan.he@mediatek.com>, <guochun.mao@mediatek.com>,
<bin.zhang@mediatek.com>, <sanny.chen@mediatek.com>,
<mao.zhong@mediatek.com>, <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
<donghunt@amazon.com>, <rdlee@amazon.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,v4,4/5] mtd: spinand: Move set/get OOB databytes to each ECC engines
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:37:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bf2dbbdf63fdfa3d8cea9afeee83ce11996f42a.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214124111.3bd39e74@xps13>
Hi Miquel,
On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 12:41 +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> >
> > @@ -299,22 +303,42 @@ static int
> > nand_ecc_sw_bch_prepare_io_req(struct nand_device *nand,
> > int total = nand->ecc.ctx.total;
> > u8 *ecccalc = engine_conf->calc_buf;
> > const u8 *data;
> > - int i;
> > + int i, ret = 0;
>
> int i, ret;
>
> >
> > /* Nothing to do for a raw operation */
> > if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_RAW)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - /* This engine does not provide BBM/free OOB bytes protection
> > */
> > - if (!req->datalen)
> > - return 0;
> > -
>
> Why? Please drop this removal here and below, it has nothing to do
> with
> the current fix, right?
>
For req->datalen == 0 and req->ooblen !=0 when write operation in
OPS_AUTO mode, it`s also need to set OOB databytes. So I remove this to
the back.
However, for OPS_RAW and OPS_PLACE_OOB mode, it`s unnecessary.
I will try to fix this.
> > nand_ecc_tweak_req(&engine_conf->req_ctx, req);
> >
> > /* No more preparation for page read */
> > if (req->type == NAND_PAGE_READ)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (req->ooblen) {
> > + memset(engine_conf->oob_buf, 0xff,
> > + nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand));
>
> I think this is only needed in the AUTO case.
>
> > +
> > + if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB) {
> > + ret = mtd_ooblayout_set_databytes(mtd, req-
> > >oobbuf.out,
> > + engine_conf-
> > >oob_buf,
> > + req->ooboffs,
> > + mtd-
> > >oobavail);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + } else {
> > + memcpy(engine_conf->oob_buf + req->ooboffs,
> > + req->oobbuf.out, req->ooblen);
> > + }
> > +
> > + engine_conf->src_oob_buf = (void *)req->oobbuf.out;
> > + req->oobbuf.out = engine_conf->oob_buf;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* This engine does not provide BBM/free OOB bytes protection
> > */
> > + if (!req->datalen)
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> I believe we can do something simpler:
>
> if (req->ooblen && req->mode == AUTO) {
> memcpy(oobbuf, req->oobbuf.out...
> mtd_ooblayout_set_databytes(using oobbuf)
> }
>
> But I believe this should be done before tweaking the request so that
> you can avoid messing with src_oob_buf, right?
Yes, you are right. For OPS_AUTO mode, the maximal request OOB len is
mtd->oobavail which smaller than nand->memorg.oobsize.
Therefore, this will use bounce oob buffer when tweaking the request.
>
> Same applies to the two other engines.
I will.
Thanks
Xiangsheng Hou
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-30 8:31 [RFC,v4,0/5] Add Mediatek SPI Nand controller and convert ECC driver Xiangsheng Hou
2021-11-30 8:31 ` [RFC,v4,1/5] mtd: nand: ecc: Move mediatek " Xiangsheng Hou
2021-11-30 8:31 ` [RFC,v4,2/5] mtd: nand: ecc: mtk: Convert to the ECC infrastructure Xiangsheng Hou
2021-12-09 10:32 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 9:09 ` xiangsheng.hou
2021-12-10 9:34 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-11 3:25 ` xiangsheng.hou
2021-12-13 9:29 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-14 3:32 ` xiangsheng.hou
2021-12-14 9:47 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-11-30 8:32 ` [RFC,v4,3/5] spi: mtk: Add mediatek SPI Nand Flash interface driver Xiangsheng Hou
2021-12-09 10:20 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 9:09 ` xiangsheng.hou
2021-12-10 9:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-11-30 8:32 ` [RFC, v4, 4/5] mtd: spinand: Move set/get OOB databytes to each ECC engines Xiangsheng Hou
2021-12-14 11:41 ` [RFC,v4,4/5] " Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 7:37 ` xiangsheng.hou [this message]
2021-11-30 8:32 ` [RFC,v4,5/5] arm64: dts: mtk: Add snfi node Xiangsheng Hou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bf2dbbdf63fdfa3d8cea9afeee83ce11996f42a.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com \
--cc=benliang.zhao@mediatek.com \
--cc=bin.zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dandan.he@mediatek.com \
--cc=donghunt@amazon.com \
--cc=guochun.mao@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mao.zhong@mediatek.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=rdlee@amazon.com \
--cc=sanny.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox