From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Emilio López" <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Marcus Cooper" <codekipper@gmail.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/*
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 19:25:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160403182543.GQ19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459694367-18635-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 11:39:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> We have growing number of mach-* directories in arch/arm, and I guess
> it might be a good time to discuss moving them into a sub-directory.
What does it buy us? Let me summarise the actual change:
- Move up to 71 arch/arm/mach-* directories to arch/arm/platforms/*,
which just means another level of directory structure. We still
end up with up to 71 directories in arch/arm/platforms/
- The ability to use obj-y rather than machine-y, where both already
work in the same way.
Is there anything I missed?
If that is all, then I really do not like this change - it's seems
to be churn for no benefit, and that's something we really should be
minimising. Linus Torvalds has historically moaned at the ARM
architecture for stuff like this.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-03 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-03 14:39 [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* Masahiro Yamada
2016-04-03 14:39 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] ARM: mediatek: move mach-mediatek/ to platforms/mediatek/ Masahiro Yamada
2016-04-03 18:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-04-04 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* Florian Fainelli
2016-04-04 1:57 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-04-04 19:02 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160403182543.GQ19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=codekipper@gmail.com \
--cc=emilio@elopez.com.ar \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox