public inbox for linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: lorenzo@kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, pabeni@redhat.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] net: airoha: Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:29:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414082949.104611-1-pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260411-airoha-fix-ndo_stop-v1-1-caddaa181739@kernel.org>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.

For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net: airoha: Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop()

Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop routine before stopping the
TX DMA and run airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue routine. Moreover,
start/stop TX/RX NAPIs in ndo_open()/ndo_stop() callbacks in order to be
sure the TX NAPIs have completed before stopping the TX DMA engine in
airoha_dev_stop routine.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> index 8e4b043af4bc..9e40c8f375c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1684,18 +1686,26 @@ static int airoha_dev_stop(struct net_device *dev)
>  	struct airoha_qdma *qdma = port->qdma;
>  	int i, err;
>
> -	netif_tx_disable(dev);
>  	err = airoha_set_vip_for_gdm_port(port, false);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(qdma->q_tx); i++)
> -		netdev_tx_reset_subqueue(dev, i);
> -
>  	airoha_set_gdm_port_fwd_cfg(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_FWD_CFG(port->id),
>  				    FE_PSE_PORT_DROP);
>
> +	netif_tx_disable(dev);
>  	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&qdma->users)) {
> +		u32 val;
> +
> +		/* Wait for TX to complete */
> +		err = read_poll_timeout(airoha_qdma_rr, val,
> +					!(val & GLOBAL_CFG_TX_DMA_BUSY_MASK),
> +					USEC_PER_MSEC, 100 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> +					false, qdma, REG_QDMA_GLOBAL_CFG);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
>                   ^^^^^^^^^^

Can this leave the device in an inconsistent state? When read_poll_timeout()
fails (TX DMA busy for more than 100ms), airoha_dev_stop() returns an error
immediately. However, atomic_dec_and_test(&qdma->users) has already
decremented qdma->users to 0, but airoha_qdma_stop_napi() was never called,
so all NAPIs remain enabled.

The networking core (__dev_close_many in net/core/dev.c) ignores the
ndo_stop return value and marks the device as down regardless. When the
device is later brought up again, airoha_dev_open() sees atomic_fetch_inc()
return 0 (old value) and calls airoha_qdma_start_napi() -> napi_enable(),
which hits BUG_ON(!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &val)) in napi_enable_locked()
because the NAPI was never disabled.

The early return also skips the netdev_tx_reset_subqueue() calls at the end
of the function.

Should the code either continue with cleanup on timeout (don't return), or
ensure NAPI and DMA state are properly cleaned up before returning?

> +
> +		airoha_qdma_stop_napi(qdma);
>  		airoha_qdma_clear(qdma, REG_QDMA_GLOBAL_CFG,
>  				  GLOBAL_CFG_TX_DMA_EN_MASK |
>  				  GLOBAL_CFG_RX_DMA_EN_MASK);

[ ... ]



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-14  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-10 22:05 [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-04-14  8:29 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-04-14  8:57   ` [net-next] " Lorenzo Bianconi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260414082949.104611-1-pabeni@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox