From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] net: airoha: Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:57:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad4BgCGNYjYACUdv@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414082949.104611-1-pabeni@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3065 bytes --]
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
>
> For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
> ---
> net: airoha: Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop()
>
> Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop routine before stopping the
> TX DMA and run airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue routine. Moreover,
> start/stop TX/RX NAPIs in ndo_open()/ndo_stop() callbacks in order to be
> sure the TX NAPIs have completed before stopping the TX DMA engine in
> airoha_dev_stop routine.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> > index 8e4b043af4bc..9e40c8f375c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -1684,18 +1686,26 @@ static int airoha_dev_stop(struct net_device *dev)
> > struct airoha_qdma *qdma = port->qdma;
> > int i, err;
> >
> > - netif_tx_disable(dev);
> > err = airoha_set_vip_for_gdm_port(port, false);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(qdma->q_tx); i++)
> > - netdev_tx_reset_subqueue(dev, i);
> > -
> > airoha_set_gdm_port_fwd_cfg(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_FWD_CFG(port->id),
> > FE_PSE_PORT_DROP);
> >
> > + netif_tx_disable(dev);
> > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&qdma->users)) {
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + /* Wait for TX to complete */
> > + err = read_poll_timeout(airoha_qdma_rr, val,
> > + !(val & GLOBAL_CFG_TX_DMA_BUSY_MASK),
> > + USEC_PER_MSEC, 100 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> > + false, qdma, REG_QDMA_GLOBAL_CFG);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Can this leave the device in an inconsistent state? When read_poll_timeout()
> fails (TX DMA busy for more than 100ms), airoha_dev_stop() returns an error
> immediately. However, atomic_dec_and_test(&qdma->users) has already
> decremented qdma->users to 0, but airoha_qdma_stop_napi() was never called,
> so all NAPIs remain enabled.
>
> The networking core (__dev_close_many in net/core/dev.c) ignores the
> ndo_stop return value and marks the device as down regardless. When the
> device is later brought up again, airoha_dev_open() sees atomic_fetch_inc()
> return 0 (old value) and calls airoha_qdma_start_napi() -> napi_enable(),
> which hits BUG_ON(!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &val)) in napi_enable_locked()
> because the NAPI was never disabled.
>
> The early return also skips the netdev_tx_reset_subqueue() calls at the end
> of the function.
>
> Should the code either continue with cleanup on timeout (don't return), or
> ensure NAPI and DMA state are properly cleaned up before returning?
ack, I will fix it in v2.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> > +
> > + airoha_qdma_stop_napi(qdma);
> > airoha_qdma_clear(qdma, REG_QDMA_GLOBAL_CFG,
> > GLOBAL_CFG_TX_DMA_EN_MASK |
> > GLOBAL_CFG_RX_DMA_EN_MASK);
>
> [ ... ]
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 22:05 [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: Wait for TX to complete in airoha_dev_stop() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-04-14 8:29 ` [net-next] " Paolo Abeni
2026-04-14 8:57 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad4BgCGNYjYACUdv@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox