* [REGRESSION] mt7925e: firmware 20260813113118 causes severe low-RSSI 5 GHz loss
@ 2026-09-04 2:09 Mario Stanski Jr
2026-09-04 6:38 ` Devin Wittmayer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mario Stanski Jr @ 2026-09-04 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-firmware
Cc: linux-wireless, linux-mediatek, regressions, jb.tsai, jwboyer,
nbd, lorenzo, ryder.lee, shayne.chen, sean.wang
Hi,
I am reporting a severe low-RSSI 5 GHz regression in the MT7925 Wi-Fi
firmware added by linux-firmware commit 3c11e660d3a8 (MR !1191).
On an MT7925/RZ717 PCIe adapter [14c3:0717], WM build
20260813113118 remains associated at about -70 dBm, but traffic suffers
23-29% packet loss, 1.2-1.8 s average RTT to the gateway, and HTTPS
timeouts. Replacing only the two Wi-Fi blobs with the previous pair and
reloading the same in-tree mt7925e driver loads WM build 20260605184805.
On the same AP/BSSID, machine position, kernel, profile and RSSI, gateway
loss becomes 0% and average RTT becomes 4.237 ms.
Firmware-only A/B results:
20260813113118 20260605184805
Gateway packet loss 23-29% 0/20 (0%)
Gateway average RTT 1.2-1.8 s 4.237 ms
Internet packet loss about 29% 0/10 (0%)
Internet average RTT about 3.7 s 15.109 ms
Three 1 MB HTTPS probes 2 connect timeouts; 3/3 complete,
1 partial timeout 4.18-5.25 MB/s
The partial newer-firmware probe received 293689/1000000 bytes in 8 s
(36702 B/s). After pinning the previous blobs, a longer confirmation at
-70 to -72 dBm returned 50/50 gateway replies (4.236 ms average), 20/20
Internet replies (15.548 ms average), and three further complete 1 MB
downloads at 3.91-4.60 MB/s. A separate acceptance run at -74 dBm also
had 0% gateway loss.
Environment:
Device: MediaTek MT7925 / AMD RZ717 Wi-Fi 7 PCIe
PCI ID: 14c3:0717
ASIC / HW-SW: 79250000 / 0x8a108a10
Driver: in-tree mt7925e
Kernel: 7.3.0-rc1, x86_64, PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Distribution: Arch-derived (CachyOS)
NetworkManager: 1.58.1
wpa_supplicant: 2.12
Link: WPA2-PSK, 5805 MHz/channel 161, VHT40, non-MLO
Regulatory: BR
Power saving: off in both runs
Module params: defaults; no experimental ASPM/CLC parameters
Firmware identities and uncompressed SHA-256:
Regressed WM/Patch: 20260813113118 / 20260813113015a
WIFI_RAM_CODE_MT7925_1_1.bin:
23ff53b4bb639b30481e2e06bb1688569ad1ba971b897936db539882abfbd120
WIFI_MT7925_PATCH_MCU_1_1_hdr.bin:
8eb46014d2a6b4124472eee7476d995008a6f40b1daffef87eb42f30d98699e1
Good WM/Patch: 20260605184805 / 20260605184651a
WIFI_RAM_CODE_MT7925_1_1.bin:
7e4ed27d1e9fe21cdefda35a22da32137b2473fada350617fb603489af19346a
WIFI_MT7925_PATCH_MCU_1_1_hdr.bin:
089dd0252a7eb95feed55950ad0fd9e6f751a07b4cf22273de722b73fa50d49e
The regressed firmware stays associated and no driver timeout/reset/AER
accompanied the failure. RSSI was effectively unchanged across the A/B.
Bluetooth firmware was not reloaded during the test.
The workaround is to pin the two Wi-Fi blobs from linux-firmware commit
bd1c66cfef5fb9cba15f1838a3fd222fb88a832b, then reboot or safely reload
mt7925e. No kernel parameters are required on this system.
References:
Regression commit / MR:
https://gitlab.com/kernel-firmware/linux-firmware/-/commit/3c11e660d3a8f8b35e12809b4b721a722b597148
https://gitlab.com/kernel-firmware/linux-firmware/-/merge_requests/1191
Previous known-good commit:
https://gitlab.com/kernel-firmware/linux-firmware/-/commit/bd1c66cfef5fb9cba15f1838a3fd222fb88a832b
Original submission thread (Message-ID
<20260818010915.445782-1-jb.tsai@mediatek.com>):
https://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2026/08/18/60
Full sanitized report and reproduction commands:
https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/issues/1128
Related low-signal report:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219429
Could you please confirm whether 20260813113118 is known to regress
low-signal 5 GHz transport, and whether the blobs should be reverted
while a fixed build is prepared? I can provide the recovery-safe A/B
script, full sanitized output, mt76 debugfs state or traces, and can test
a replacement firmware with the same procedure.
Regards,
MJr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [REGRESSION] mt7925e: firmware 20260813113118 causes severe low-RSSI 5 GHz loss
2026-09-04 2:09 [REGRESSION] mt7925e: firmware 20260813113118 causes severe low-RSSI 5 GHz loss Mario Stanski Jr
@ 2026-09-04 6:38 ` Devin Wittmayer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Devin Wittmayer @ 2026-09-04 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario Stanski Jr
Cc: linux-firmware, linux-wireless, linux-mediatek, regressions,
jb.tsai, jwboyer, nbd, lorenzo, ryder.lee, shayne.chen, sean.wang
Thanks for the A/B, and for publishing the hashes. They made this quick
to set up on my side.
Unfortunately, try as I might, I cannot reproduce it. Same ASIC revision
79250000 and HW/SW 0x8a108a10 as yours, both firmware pairs hash-matched
to the SHA-256s you gave, 5 GHz at -70 to -79 dBm against a WPA2 AP on
5765.
Eight arms: two in-tree kernels, an out-of-tree mt76 from 30 August so
the driver is 7.3 era, power save off to match yours, idle and loaded,
and a ten minute soak with a continuous pull underneath.
gateway packet loss 0% in every arm, roughly 1000 packets
gateway rtt 11 to 121 ms average
1 MB HTTPS probes 3 of 3 completed in every arm
25 MB pull 1.4 to 2.05 MB/s
None of that argues with your result. You held everything but the blobs
and got a clean separation, and I would trust that over my negative.
What it does suggest is that the firmware on its own is not enough on
this silicon at this signal, so the rest of it is in what I could not
match. Your board is an AMD RZ717, 14c3:0717, where mine is an AzureWave
14c3:7925. Your regulatory domain is BR, where mine is pinned to CA by
the AP's country IE. Your link is VHT40 on 5805 and mine is HE on 5765.
If anyone else on an RZ717 has seen this, that would narrow it quickly.
Devin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-04 6:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-04 2:09 [REGRESSION] mt7925e: firmware 20260813113118 causes severe low-RSSI 5 GHz loss Mario Stanski Jr
2026-09-04 6:38 ` Devin Wittmayer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox