From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc,metag: Do not hardcode maximum userspace stack size
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 07:48:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399042116.2202.1.camel@dabdike> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5363876A.2030709@imgtec.com>
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:54 +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> On 01/05/14 18:50, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> >> +
> >> +config MAX_STACK_SIZE_MB
> >> + int "Maximum user stack size (MB)"
> >> + default 80
> >> + range 8 256 if METAG
> >> + range 8 2048
> >> + depends on STACK_GROWSUP
> >> + help
> >> + This is the maximum stack size in Megabytes in the VM layout of user
> >> + processes when the stack grows upwards (currently only on parisc and
> >> + metag arch). The stack will be located at the highest memory address
> >> + minus the given value, unless the RLIMIT_STACK hard limit is changed
> >> + to a smaller value in which case that is used.
> >> +
> >> + A sane initial value is 80 MB.
> >
> > There's one final issue with this: placement of the stack only really
> > matters on 32 bits. We have three expanding memory areas: stack, heap
> > and maps. On 64 bits these are placed well separated from each other on
> > 64 bits, so an artificial limit like this doesn't matter.
>
> Does the following fixup diff look reasonable? It forces
> MAX_STACK_SIZE_MB to 1024 and hides the Kconfig option for 64BIT,
> effectively leaving the behaviour unchanged in that case.
>
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index e80075979530..b0307f737bd7 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -583,7 +583,8 @@ config GENERIC_EARLY_IOREMAP
> bool
>
> config MAX_STACK_SIZE_MB
> - int "Maximum user stack size (MB)"
> + int "Maximum user stack size (MB)" if !64BIT
> + default 1024 if 64BIT
> default 80
> range 8 256 if METAG
> range 8 2048
Yes, I think that's probably correct ... parisc doesn't actually have
anything other than a testbed 64 bit userspace, so this is a bit
theoretical for us.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-02 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 21:26 [PATCH] parisc,metag: Do not hardcode maximum userspace stack size Helge Deller
[not found] ` <20140430212602.GA20601-9U14vcwSumxwFLYp8hBm2A@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 22:53 ` John David Anglin
2014-05-01 11:19 ` James Hogan
2014-05-01 17:50 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-02 11:54 ` James Hogan
2014-05-02 14:48 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2014-05-04 7:28 ` Helge Deller
[not found] ` <5365EC05.5080900-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 11:18 ` James Hogan
2014-05-13 19:45 ` Helge Deller
2014-05-13 22:52 ` James Hogan
2014-05-01 18:08 ` Aw: " Helge Deller
2014-05-01 14:06 ` John David Anglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1399042116.2202.1.camel@dabdike \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-metag@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox