From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc,metag: Do not hardcode maximum userspace stack size
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:54:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5363876A.2030709@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398966636.2174.21.camel@dabdike>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1499 bytes --]
On 01/05/14 18:50, James Bottomley wrote:
>
>> +
>> +config MAX_STACK_SIZE_MB
>> + int "Maximum user stack size (MB)"
>> + default 80
>> + range 8 256 if METAG
>> + range 8 2048
>> + depends on STACK_GROWSUP
>> + help
>> + This is the maximum stack size in Megabytes in the VM layout of user
>> + processes when the stack grows upwards (currently only on parisc and
>> + metag arch). The stack will be located at the highest memory address
>> + minus the given value, unless the RLIMIT_STACK hard limit is changed
>> + to a smaller value in which case that is used.
>> +
>> + A sane initial value is 80 MB.
>
> There's one final issue with this: placement of the stack only really
> matters on 32 bits. We have three expanding memory areas: stack, heap
> and maps. On 64 bits these are placed well separated from each other on
> 64 bits, so an artificial limit like this doesn't matter.
Does the following fixup diff look reasonable? It forces
MAX_STACK_SIZE_MB to 1024 and hides the Kconfig option for 64BIT,
effectively leaving the behaviour unchanged in that case.
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index e80075979530..b0307f737bd7 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -583,7 +583,8 @@ config GENERIC_EARLY_IOREMAP
bool
config MAX_STACK_SIZE_MB
- int "Maximum user stack size (MB)"
+ int "Maximum user stack size (MB)" if !64BIT
+ default 1024 if 64BIT
default 80
range 8 256 if METAG
range 8 2048
Thanks
James
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-02 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 21:26 [PATCH] parisc,metag: Do not hardcode maximum userspace stack size Helge Deller
[not found] ` <20140430212602.GA20601-9U14vcwSumxwFLYp8hBm2A@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 22:53 ` John David Anglin
2014-05-01 11:19 ` James Hogan
2014-05-01 17:50 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-02 11:54 ` James Hogan [this message]
2014-05-02 14:48 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-04 7:28 ` Helge Deller
[not found] ` <5365EC05.5080900-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 11:18 ` James Hogan
2014-05-13 19:45 ` Helge Deller
2014-05-13 22:52 ` James Hogan
2014-05-01 18:08 ` Aw: " Helge Deller
2014-05-01 14:06 ` John David Anglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5363876A.2030709@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-metag@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox