Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "colin" <colin@realtek.com.tw>
To: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or    Montavista?
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:11:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601c4bbeb$c9ffcdf0$8b1a13ac@realtek.com.tw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20041027031430.GC14668@linux-mips.org


Dear Ralf,

> The time where choosing 2.4 for new project still did make sense is over.

Why? Isn't it stable of Kernel 2.6 for MIPS?

Regards,
Colin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "colin" <colin@realtek.com.tw>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or
Montavista?


> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:08:34PM +0800, colin wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > We want to begin to put Linux to our new board with 4KEc CPU.
> > Is it better to start porting from Montavista's Kernel, or from the one
of
> > linux-mips.org?
> > I phoned the sales of Montavista and he told me the difference of these
2
> > kernels are little, but their kernels have been tested a lot for
stability.
>
> A kernel isn't everything you'd get from Montavista; the comparison of
> a site that's primarily geared towards development and a company that
> is selling is probably not appropriate ...
>
> > Naturally, we would like to choose the kernel version above 2.6.
>
> The time where choosing 2.4 for new project still did make sense is over.
>
>   Ralf

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "colin" <colin@realtek.com.tw>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or    Montavista?
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:11:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601c4bbeb$c9ffcdf0$8b1a13ac@realtek.com.tw> (raw)
Message-ID: <20041027061120.nUwR_s21JA29-Z_amqsziA7YrblaVvFBdQqYYorersE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20041027031430.GC14668@linux-mips.org


Dear Ralf,

> The time where choosing 2.4 for new project still did make sense is over.

Why? Isn't it stable of Kernel 2.6 for MIPS?

Regards,
Colin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "colin" <colin@realtek.com.tw>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or
Montavista?


> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:08:34PM +0800, colin wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > We want to begin to put Linux to our new board with 4KEc CPU.
> > Is it better to start porting from Montavista's Kernel, or from the one
of
> > linux-mips.org?
> > I phoned the sales of Montavista and he told me the difference of these
2
> > kernels are little, but their kernels have been tested a lot for
stability.
>
> A kernel isn't everything you'd get from Montavista; the comparison of
> a site that's primarily geared towards development and a company that
> is selling is probably not appropriate ...
>
> > Naturally, we would like to choose the kernel version above 2.6.
>
> The time where choosing 2.4 for new project still did make sense is over.
>
>   Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-27  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-26  7:08 Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista? colin
2004-10-26  7:08 ` colin
2004-10-26  7:11 ` Pete Popov
2004-10-26 16:10   ` Manish Lachwani
2004-10-26 16:14     ` Pete Popov
2004-10-27  3:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-10-27  6:11   ` colin [this message]
2004-10-27  6:11     ` colin
2004-10-27  6:20     ` Pete Popov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002601c4bbeb$c9ffcdf0$8b1a13ac@realtek.com.tw' \
    --to=colin@realtek.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox