From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <KevinK@mips.com>
To: "Stuart Longland" <redhatter@gentoo.org>,
"kernel coder" <lhrkernelcoder@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: How to improve performance of 2.6 kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:19:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00b201c5d32e$2de780b0$0302a8c0@Ulysses> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 43539ADF.6040504@gentoo.org
>kernel coder wrote:
>> I am also attaching the benchmarks I took for both the kernels. Is
>> there any way I can improve 2.6's performance? Thanks.
>
>Hi,
> Don't mean to nitpick... but do you think it wise to use a proprietry
>format like Microsoft Excel on a prodominantly Linux-user list? :-)
>Tab-delimited would probably be better for distribution on a mailing list.
There are 2D data plots that are hard to do as ASCII art. ;o)
It opened fine for me in Open Office - there was one set of graphs
that looked to be empty, but I couldn't tell if that was OO screwing
up or the way the spreadsheet went out. But the raw data was
legible and troubling.
> How much slower are we talking here? And in what regards?
Memory copy, network I/O, and disk I/O, by factors ranging from
about 10% to almost 50% - I'd say about 25% on the average.
If this can't be explained by a configuration error, we have a real
problem here, but if that's the case, I'm surprised no one has raised
a red flag earlier.
Regards,
Kevin K.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <KevinK@mips.com>
To: Stuart Longland <redhatter@gentoo.org>,
kernel coder <lhrkernelcoder@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: How to improve performance of 2.6 kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:19:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00b201c5d32e$2de780b0$0302a8c0@Ulysses> (raw)
Message-ID: <20051017151931.C18ZJOPfCwTkV8eBZILyggWol_enTPYijoy7tk2V7hc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 43539ADF.6040504@gentoo.org
>kernel coder wrote:
>> I am also attaching the benchmarks I took for both the kernels. Is
>> there any way I can improve 2.6's performance? Thanks.
>
>Hi,
> Don't mean to nitpick... but do you think it wise to use a proprietry
>format like Microsoft Excel on a prodominantly Linux-user list? :-)
>Tab-delimited would probably be better for distribution on a mailing list.
There are 2D data plots that are hard to do as ASCII art. ;o)
It opened fine for me in Open Office - there was one set of graphs
that looked to be empty, but I couldn't tell if that was OO screwing
up or the way the spreadsheet went out. But the raw data was
legible and troubling.
> How much slower are we talking here? And in what regards?
Memory copy, network I/O, and disk I/O, by factors ranging from
about 10% to almost 50% - I'd say about 25% on the average.
If this can't be explained by a configuration error, we have a real
problem here, but if that's the case, I'm surprised no one has raised
a red flag earlier.
Regards,
Kevin K.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-17 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-17 11:29 How to improve performance of 2.6 kernel kernel coder
2005-10-17 12:36 ` Stuart Longland
2005-10-17 15:19 ` Kevin D. Kissell [this message]
2005-10-17 15:19 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2005-10-17 16:38 ` Dan Malek
2005-10-17 16:38 ` Dan Malek
2005-10-19 5:55 ` Fwd: " kernel coder
2005-10-19 15:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-10-17 16:07 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00b201c5d32e$2de780b0$0302a8c0@Ulysses' \
--to=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=lhrkernelcoder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=redhatter@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox