From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
To: "Prasad Boddupalli" <bprasad@cs.arizona.edu>,
<linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: replacing synthesized tlb handlers with older ones
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:13:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b401c68678$98199a10$10eca8c0@grendel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: e8180c7f0606021139w6d26e03eice708d5076cccf64@mail.gmail.com
The TLB refill handler behavior for 1 CPU is fundamentally
different than for SMP. In the uniprocessor case, the page
table origin is implicit, whereas in SMP it needs to be indexed
by some per-CPU value, typically maintained in the Context
register. Pre-synthesed kernels set up up so that the Context
value would be shifted left 23 bits, then right by 2 bits, to generate
an offset. The newer system eliminates the right shift by ensuring
that the CPU index is stored in a pre-scaled form, and that bits
23 and 24 are zero. So you can't just drop the old code into
the newer kernel, unless you also change the setup of Context.
A single CPU would work, because 0 == 0, otherwise...
Try nuking those right shifts.
Regards,
Kevin K.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Prasad Boddupalli" <bprasad@cs.arizona.edu>
To: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:39 PM
Subject: replacing synthesized tlb handlers with older ones
> Hi,
>
> To embed some additional functionality in the tlb refill handler, I
> replaced the synthesized refill handlers in 2.6.16 linux with those
> from 2.6.6 (for example tlb-r4k.S under arch/mips/mm-32). Everything
> seem ok when I bring up one CPU, but causes unrecoverable exceptions
> in the kernel when I bring up multiple CPUs. I explored if that could
> be because of unflushed icaches on other CPUs. but that doesn't seem
> to be the case.
>
> Have anyone run into similar problem ?
>
> thank you,
> Prasad.
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
To: Prasad Boddupalli <bprasad@cs.arizona.edu>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: replacing synthesized tlb handlers with older ones
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:13:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b401c68678$98199a10$10eca8c0@grendel> (raw)
Message-ID: <20060602191311.UiRs3PT90gbL-1-vDqj_eOrRBdbaY-YlVc-jSjmZwrc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: e8180c7f0606021139w6d26e03eice708d5076cccf64@mail.gmail.com
The TLB refill handler behavior for 1 CPU is fundamentally
different than for SMP. In the uniprocessor case, the page
table origin is implicit, whereas in SMP it needs to be indexed
by some per-CPU value, typically maintained in the Context
register. Pre-synthesed kernels set up up so that the Context
value would be shifted left 23 bits, then right by 2 bits, to generate
an offset. The newer system eliminates the right shift by ensuring
that the CPU index is stored in a pre-scaled form, and that bits
23 and 24 are zero. So you can't just drop the old code into
the newer kernel, unless you also change the setup of Context.
A single CPU would work, because 0 == 0, otherwise...
Try nuking those right shifts.
Regards,
Kevin K.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Prasad Boddupalli" <bprasad@cs.arizona.edu>
To: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:39 PM
Subject: replacing synthesized tlb handlers with older ones
> Hi,
>
> To embed some additional functionality in the tlb refill handler, I
> replaced the synthesized refill handlers in 2.6.16 linux with those
> from 2.6.6 (for example tlb-r4k.S under arch/mips/mm-32). Everything
> seem ok when I bring up one CPU, but causes unrecoverable exceptions
> in the kernel when I bring up multiple CPUs. I explored if that could
> be because of unflushed icaches on other CPUs. but that doesn't seem
> to be the case.
>
> Have anyone run into similar problem ?
>
> thank you,
> Prasad.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 18:39 replacing synthesized tlb handlers with older ones Prasad Boddupalli
2006-06-02 19:13 ` Kevin D. Kissell [this message]
2006-06-02 19:13 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-06-04 17:51 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01b401c68678$98199a10$10eca8c0@grendel' \
--to=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=bprasad@cs.arizona.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox