From: ariel@oz.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
To: ReddD@aurorabio.com (Doug Redd)
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Linux on O2
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 16:56:36 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199812240056.QAA21876@oz.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01BE2E78.9742E750@REDDD2> from "Doug Redd" at Dec 23, 98 01:31:46 pm
:
:Can anyone tell me how far along a port to O2 is and if I can be of any
:help? I have a couple of these that are hardly being used sitting
:around the office, and would find it interesting to try and get Linux
:working on them.
:
The main effort required to port Linux to the O2 is the drivers
for a completely new set of hardware devices: The CRIME (graphics)
and MACE (I/O) chips in particular.
The (relativley inexpensive) hardware is not the hard part to get,
What will be needed is mostly hardware specs and I'm not sure
who has access to these and what restrictions are there on them
at this point in time.
:Any information is appreciated...
:
<personal perspective>
At the time we started with the Indy/Linux port management
considered the UMA architecture of the O2 too innovative to
be widely exposed. With SGI becoming friendlier towards Open Source
(see funding Samba, Linux International, freeware.sgi.com, etc.)
This may change. I just haven't heard anything official about it yet.
Now consider that SGI will be announcing a new Intel based
machine (some people asked about it on this forum before) RSN
According to the public site:
http://www.sgibreakthrough.com/
The launch is on Jan 11, 1999.
I have an O2 on my desk and I love it -- but:
I would say that since it is an Intel machine and assuming limited
resources it would make much more sense to put Linux on that one,
rather than on the O2; mainly due to a much wider availability of
precompiled and pre-configured software, much larger compatible
installed base and potential contributors, better price/perf, a real
opportinity to bring high-end 3D graphics to the masses, etc.
etc.
Of course, SGI employees cannot comment any further on this yet
unannounced product ... but it *that* one could be "opened"
it would be *really* great (my personal wish).
<end personal perspective>
--
Peace, Ariel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ariel@oz.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
To: Doug Redd <ReddD@aurorabio.com>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Linux on O2
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 16:56:36 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199812240056.QAA21876@oz.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19981224005636.wW5v5smn_Exdxd2OZ3HKUoEIIs21XKZie2npFY8W8Do@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01BE2E78.9742E750@REDDD2> from "Doug Redd" at Dec 23, 98 01:31:46 pm
:
:Can anyone tell me how far along a port to O2 is and if I can be of any
:help? I have a couple of these that are hardly being used sitting
:around the office, and would find it interesting to try and get Linux
:working on them.
:
The main effort required to port Linux to the O2 is the drivers
for a completely new set of hardware devices: The CRIME (graphics)
and MACE (I/O) chips in particular.
The (relativley inexpensive) hardware is not the hard part to get,
What will be needed is mostly hardware specs and I'm not sure
who has access to these and what restrictions are there on them
at this point in time.
:Any information is appreciated...
:
<personal perspective>
At the time we started with the Indy/Linux port management
considered the UMA architecture of the O2 too innovative to
be widely exposed. With SGI becoming friendlier towards Open Source
(see funding Samba, Linux International, freeware.sgi.com, etc.)
This may change. I just haven't heard anything official about it yet.
Now consider that SGI will be announcing a new Intel based
machine (some people asked about it on this forum before) RSN
According to the public site:
http://www.sgibreakthrough.com/
The launch is on Jan 11, 1999.
I have an O2 on my desk and I love it -- but:
I would say that since it is an Intel machine and assuming limited
resources it would make much more sense to put Linux on that one,
rather than on the O2; mainly due to a much wider availability of
precompiled and pre-configured software, much larger compatible
installed base and potential contributors, better price/perf, a real
opportinity to bring high-end 3D graphics to the masses, etc.
etc.
Of course, SGI employees cannot comment any further on this yet
unannounced product ... but it *that* one could be "opened"
it would be *really* great (my personal wish).
<end personal perspective>
--
Peace, Ariel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-12-24 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-12-23 21:31 Linux on O2 Doug Redd
1998-12-24 0:56 ` Ariel Faigon [this message]
1998-12-24 0:56 ` Ariel Faigon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-21 14:43 linux on o2 Jeff Utter
2002-01-21 21:17 ` nick
2002-01-21 21:54 ` Jeff Utter
2002-01-21 21:59 ` nick
2002-01-29 22:23 ` Jeff Utter
2002-01-29 22:24 ` nick
2004-06-21 13:10 Linux on O2 Yanick Quirion
2004-06-21 13:10 ` Yanick Quirion
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199812240056.QAA21876@oz.engr.sgi.com \
--to=ariel@oz.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=ReddD@aurorabio.com \
--cc=ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox