From: Karel van Houten <K.H.C.vanHouten@research.kpn.com>
To: spock@mgnet.de (Klaus Naumann)
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com (Linux/MIPS list),
linux-mips@fnet.fr (Linux MIPS fnet.fr)
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker online
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:21:07 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200010221021.MAA00815@sparta.research.kpn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010220951060.4857-100000@spock.mgnet.de>
Hi Klaus,
Klaus wrote:
> Actually writing the bug tracker wasn't an act of boredom
> (if you meant it that way). I had the strong feeling that we have
> a lot of open problems and we're loosing control which are still open.
> Well, in fact your mail is the only comment from the mailinglists on a
> project which has taken a week to write and makes sense to me and other
> ppl. I hoped that if ppl don't like the idea or the way I did it, that
> they at least would tell me to make it better.
> Just not saying anything is pretty lame and to be honest I'm pretty
> disappointed about that.
> Note that I'm not hunting for a "Hey what a cool idea !" or so -
> but I'd have expected at least any comment.
You sound a bit disappointed. Well, I can imagine, but you should
give people more time. I had planned to look into your bug tracker,
but didn't found the time yet (Your mail was still in my inbox).
Concerning the boot output parser:
> This is indeed a interesting idea. Writing it wouldn't be a big deal.
> But the question is if it's worth writing it. First we would need
> some ppl which actally send the info somewhere - I'm pretty
> much in doubt, that we will find enough so that it rents.
> Second question is if ppl are actually interested in such a thing.
> I'll not again waste time writing something where I don't get at least a
> small ammount of feedback and which noone is using.
I think it is really useful to know what configurations / kernel versions
and hardware other people have. I have published the bootlogs of
my DECStations on my website.
By the way, you could update your mips-linux webpages in respect to
DECStations from my info: http://www.xs4all.nl/~vhouten/mipsel
I'm currently running kernel 2.4.0-test9, and I'm in the process
of rebuilding RedHat 6.1 packages to get a minimal distribution ready.
Regards,
--
Karel van Houten
----------------------------------------------------------
The box said "Requires Windows 95 or better."
I can't understand why it won't work on my Linux computer.
----------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Karel van Houten <K.H.C.vanHouten@research.kpn.com>
To: Klaus Naumann <spock@mgnet.de>
Cc: Linux/MIPS list <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>,
"Linux MIPS fnet.fr" <linux-mips@fnet.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker online
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:21:07 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200010221021.MAA00815@sparta.research.kpn.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20001022102107.alUK847_Egf84z_K7D_K2cab1vHC1z3LgzXJamTqzNM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010220951060.4857-100000@spock.mgnet.de>
Hi Klaus,
Klaus wrote:
> Actually writing the bug tracker wasn't an act of boredom
> (if you meant it that way). I had the strong feeling that we have
> a lot of open problems and we're loosing control which are still open.
> Well, in fact your mail is the only comment from the mailinglists on a
> project which has taken a week to write and makes sense to me and other
> ppl. I hoped that if ppl don't like the idea or the way I did it, that
> they at least would tell me to make it better.
> Just not saying anything is pretty lame and to be honest I'm pretty
> disappointed about that.
> Note that I'm not hunting for a "Hey what a cool idea !" or so -
> but I'd have expected at least any comment.
You sound a bit disappointed. Well, I can imagine, but you should
give people more time. I had planned to look into your bug tracker,
but didn't found the time yet (Your mail was still in my inbox).
Concerning the boot output parser:
> This is indeed a interesting idea. Writing it wouldn't be a big deal.
> But the question is if it's worth writing it. First we would need
> some ppl which actally send the info somewhere - I'm pretty
> much in doubt, that we will find enough so that it rents.
> Second question is if ppl are actually interested in such a thing.
> I'll not again waste time writing something where I don't get at least a
> small ammount of feedback and which noone is using.
I think it is really useful to know what configurations / kernel versions
and hardware other people have. I have published the bootlogs of
my DECStations on my website.
By the way, you could update your mips-linux webpages in respect to
DECStations from my info: http://www.xs4all.nl/~vhouten/mipsel
I'm currently running kernel 2.4.0-test9, and I'm in the process
of rebuilding RedHat 6.1 packages to get a minimal distribution ready.
Regards,
--
Karel van Houten
----------------------------------------------------------
The box said "Requires Windows 95 or better."
I can't understand why it won't work on my Linux computer.
----------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-22 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-20 17:45 Bug Tracker online Klaus Naumann
2000-10-21 18:21 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-22 8:04 ` Klaus Naumann
2000-10-22 10:21 ` Karel van Houten [this message]
2000-10-22 10:21 ` Karel van Houten
2000-10-22 10:52 ` Klaus Naumann
2000-10-22 11:45 ` Ulrich Teichert
2000-10-22 11:45 ` Ulrich Teichert
2000-10-22 11:54 ` Klaus Naumann
2000-10-22 12:16 ` Ulrich Teichert
2000-10-22 12:16 ` Ulrich Teichert
2000-10-22 16:52 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-22 17:08 ` Karel van Houten
2000-10-22 17:08 ` Karel van Houten
2000-10-23 14:25 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-23 14:44 ` r8000 nick
2000-10-23 14:44 ` r8000 nick
2000-10-23 15:45 ` r8000 Florian Lohoff
2000-10-22 10:30 ` Bug Tracker online Florian Lohoff
2000-10-22 8:25 ` Guido Guenther
2000-10-22 8:58 ` Klaus Naumann
2000-10-22 9:02 ` Martin Schulze
2000-10-22 15:32 ` Keith M Wesolowski
2000-10-22 16:20 ` Klaus Naumann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200010221021.MAA00815@sparta.research.kpn.com \
--to=k.h.c.vanhouten@research.kpn.com \
--cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=spock@mgnet.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox