Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>,
	"Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>,
	"MIPS/Linux List (SGI)" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Dumb Question on Cross-Development
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:10:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010403171005.A31953@bacchus.dhis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010403112218.25523B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:26:11AM +0200

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:26:11AM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> > Cross-compilation is IMHO so broken when it comes to userspace
> > than noone really thinking of having something reusable would
> > consider this. It all ends beeing a really ugly hack.
> 
>  I disagree.  It's not that userland cross-compilation is broken.  It's
> just the matter of certain programmers who do not care to write
> scripts/Makefiles to support cross-development portably.  They might even
> not realize there exists such a feature as cross-compilation. 

Brokeness starts with autoconf's AC_CHECK_SIZEOF macro implementation
which is used frequently throughout a whole distribution and there are
so many test that require actually execution of code on the target that
fix a whole distribution for crosscompilation and keeping it uptodate
is seriously double-plus un-fun.

  Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-03 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-02 12:24 Dumb Question on Cross-Development Kevin D. Kissell
2001-04-02 12:24 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-04-02 13:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-04-02 13:14   ` Ralf Baechle
2001-04-02 19:20   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-04-02 19:20     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-04-02 21:48     ` Florian Lohoff
2001-04-02 22:22       ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-04-02 22:22         ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-04-02 22:30         ` Florian Lohoff
2001-04-03  2:57           ` Joe deBlaquiere
2001-04-04 15:17             ` Jay Carlson
2001-04-04 15:17               ` Jay Carlson
2001-04-03  6:11           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-04-03  9:52             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-03  9:50           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-03 17:34           ` Jun Sun
2001-04-04 10:02             ` Florian Lohoff
2001-04-04 10:15               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-04-04 11:02                 ` Florian Lohoff
2001-04-04 12:15                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-04 11:22               ` Alan Cox
2001-04-04 11:22                 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-04 16:05                 ` Florian Lohoff
2001-04-04 18:06               ` Jun Sun
2001-04-04 18:45                 ` Florian Lohoff
2001-04-06  9:37           ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-04-03  9:26       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-03 15:10         ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-04-04 12:06           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-04 12:29             ` Ralf Baechle
2001-04-04 13:39               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-04 14:23                 ` Carsten Langgaard
2001-04-04 15:37                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-05 10:54                     ` Carsten Langgaard
2001-04-05 12:05                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-05 14:35                         ` Carsten Langgaard
2001-04-05 16:50                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-05 12:32                       ` Ralf Baechle
2001-04-06 15:30                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-07 15:29                 ` Joe deBlaquiere
2001-04-09 12:16                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-02 21:56     ` Thiemo Seufer
2001-04-02 23:41 ` Binutils fixed to deal with 'insmod' issue and discussion Steven J. Hill
2001-04-03  2:17   ` Thiemo Seufer
2001-04-03  8:26     ` Ralf Baechle
2001-04-03 17:27       ` Steven J. Hill
2001-04-04  5:57         ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-04-04 16:12       ` Thiemo Seufer
2001-04-03 15:46     ` Steven J. Hill
2001-04-03 16:59   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-03 16:56     ` Steven J. Hill
2001-04-04 11:35       ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010403171005.A31953@bacchus.dhis.org \
    --to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=flo@rfc822.org \
    --cc=kevink@mips.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox