From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>, "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@cotw.com>,
Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, Tom Appermont <tea@sonycom.com>,
linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 16:16:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010509161654.A2466@bacchus.dhis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010509204803.22796A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:59:34PM +0200
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:59:34PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > format, so I don't see any real reason for raising version requirements
> > for libc.
>
> That would be needed if elf(32|64)-trad(little|big)mips was specified
> explicitly as rtld-oformat in sysdeps/mips/mipsel/rtld-parms and
> sysdeps/mips/rtld-parms.
>
> Note that libc doesn't require any version of binutils at all now.
> This is probably bad as using pre-2.11 versions of binutils may yield
> weird results.
Seems like only certain version are affected; the more or less randomly
choosen one I use for the RH 7 port seems to work quite well so far. What
bug is that?
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-09 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-05 12:47 Binary compatibility break understood ? Florian Lohoff
2001-05-07 19:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-08 18:25 ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09 0:43 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 7:59 ` Tom Appermont
2001-05-09 8:46 ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09 12:14 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 12:27 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 12:51 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 12:45 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:59 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 13:49 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 14:06 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 14:15 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:07 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 13:18 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:37 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 18:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 18:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 19:16 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-05-09 19:43 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-10 2:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 19:17 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 19:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-10 18:08 ` Ryan Murray
2001-05-10 19:22 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-11 7:56 ` Tom Appermont
2001-05-11 9:26 ` Keith M Wesolowski
2001-05-11 10:42 ` Tom Appermont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010509161654.A2466@bacchus.dhis.org \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=aj@suse.de \
--cc=flo@rfc822.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=sjhill@cotw.com \
--cc=tea@sonycom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox