Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Appermont <tea@sonycom.com>
To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:56:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010511095628.D8495@sonycom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010510162221.A1736@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:22:21PM -0300


> > To get the new targets working correctly:
> > 	* new binutils
> > 	* new gcc built with new binutils (does the 2.95.4 branch have the
> >         changes, or only 3.0?)
> > 	* new libc built with new gcc
> > 	* rebuild gcc with the new libc
> > 
> > Am I missing anything?
> 
> The latter three steps are not necessary.

To avoid any further confusion, which then are the versions 
( & patches ) of binutils / gcc / libc needed to get a
linux mips toolchain we can use until the end of time? 

Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-11  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-05 12:47 Binary compatibility break understood ? Florian Lohoff
2001-05-07 19:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-08 18:25   ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09  0:43     ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09  7:59       ` Tom Appermont
2001-05-09  8:46         ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09 12:14           ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 12:27             ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 12:51               ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 12:45                 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:59                   ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 13:49                     ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 14:06                       ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 14:15                         ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:07                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 13:18                   ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:37                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 18:09                     ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 18:59                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 19:16                         ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 19:43                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-10  2:11                             ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 19:17                       ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 19:24                         ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-10 18:08             ` Ryan Murray
2001-05-10 19:22               ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-11  7:56                 ` Tom Appermont [this message]
2001-05-11  9:26                   ` Keith M Wesolowski
2001-05-11 10:42                     ` Tom Appermont

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010511095628.D8495@sonycom.com \
    --to=tea@sonycom.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox