From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 19:23:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010526192340.B1415@bacchus.dhis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00c901c0e631$4bcebd80$0deca8c0@Ulysses>; from kevink@mips.com on Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:14:43AM +0200
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:14:43AM +0200, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> Fair enough. It was an offhand remark. But seriously, what does
> the "R" constraint mean here? The only documentation I've got
> (http://linux.fh-heilbronn.de/doku/GNU/docs/gcc/gcc_163.html#SEC163)
> says that "Q" through "U" are reserved for use with EXTRA_CONSTRAINT
> in machine-dependent definitions of arbitrary operand types. When
> and where does it get bound for MIPS gcc, and what is it supposed
> to mean? If I compile this kind of fragment using a "m" constraint,
> it seems to do the right thing, at least on my archaic native compiler.
Correct, "R" is a machine dependent constraint. At least when it's working
right it's supposed to expand into offset(reg) where offset is limited
to 16 bits. That's implemented in gcc/config/gcc/mips/mips.h's
EXTRA_CONSTRAINT macro. In case of an "R" constraint gcc calls the
simple_memory_operand() function which will return 1 if the memory operand
fits into a single instruction.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-26 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-23 21:52 [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-24 13:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-24 23:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-25 13:13 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-25 21:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-25 21:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-25 21:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-26 22:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-26 22:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-26 22:23 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-05-28 11:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-28 13:48 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-28 13:48 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-28 13:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-25 20:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-25 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-28 11:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-30 0:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-30 7:02 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-30 7:02 ` Kevin D. Kissell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010526192340.B1415@bacchus.dhis.org \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox