From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@debian.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 00:14:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00c901c0e631$4bcebd80$0deca8c0@Ulysses> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010525144937.A28370@nevyn.them.org
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0200, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> > > The following program cannot be compiled with gcc 2.95.3, because the
> > > offset is out of range (I consider it a bug in gcc -- it should
allocate
> > > and load a temporary register itself and pass it appropriately as %0,
> >
> > I think gcc can be forgiven for not allocating a temporary,
> > given the ".set noat"...
>
> Except, of course, gcc doesn't even know the set noat is there. It
> doesn't parse the interior of asm() statements.
Fair enough. It was an offhand remark. But seriously, what does
the "R" constraint mean here? The only documentation I've got
(http://linux.fh-heilbronn.de/doku/GNU/docs/gcc/gcc_163.html#SEC163)
says that "Q" through "U" are reserved for use with EXTRA_CONSTRAINT
in machine-dependent definitions of arbitrary operand types. When
and where does it get bound for MIPS gcc, and what is it supposed
to mean? If I compile this kind of fragment using a "m" constraint,
it seems to do the right thing, at least on my archaic native compiler.
Kevin K.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 00:14:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00c901c0e631$4bcebd80$0deca8c0@Ulysses> (raw)
Message-ID: <20010526221443.g5KTuNHQNWoXmCEM1Jr2NDKG4D6YlB-wYhSuHT_UwQU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010525144937.A28370@nevyn.them.org
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0200, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> > > The following program cannot be compiled with gcc 2.95.3, because the
> > > offset is out of range (I consider it a bug in gcc -- it should
allocate
> > > and load a temporary register itself and pass it appropriately as %0,
> >
> > I think gcc can be forgiven for not allocating a temporary,
> > given the ".set noat"...
>
> Except, of course, gcc doesn't even know the set noat is there. It
> doesn't parse the interior of asm() statements.
Fair enough. It was an offhand remark. But seriously, what does
the "R" constraint mean here? The only documentation I've got
(http://linux.fh-heilbronn.de/doku/GNU/docs/gcc/gcc_163.html#SEC163)
says that "Q" through "U" are reserved for use with EXTRA_CONSTRAINT
in machine-dependent definitions of arbitrary operand types. When
and where does it get bound for MIPS gcc, and what is it supposed
to mean? If I compile this kind of fragment using a "m" constraint,
it seems to do the right thing, at least on my archaic native compiler.
Kevin K.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-26 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-23 21:52 [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-24 13:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-24 23:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-25 13:13 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-25 21:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-25 21:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-25 21:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-26 22:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell [this message]
2001-05-26 22:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-26 22:23 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-28 11:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-28 13:48 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-28 13:48 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-28 13:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-25 20:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-25 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-28 11:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-30 0:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-05-30 7:02 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2001-05-30 7:02 ` Kevin D. Kissell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00c901c0e631$4bcebd80$0deca8c0@Ulysses' \
--to=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox