Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karsten Merker <karsten@excalibur.cologne.de>
To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: busybox does not like 2.4.8, or the other way around?
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 07:30:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010921073007.B618@excalibur.cologne.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BAA962D.C55F2239@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:21:49PM -0700

On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:21:49PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote:

> I have a small busybox userland that works fine with 2.4.2 kernel, but failed
> with the latest 2.4.8 kernel.  The symptom is that it is stuck at the
> following prompt:

[busybox waiting for keypress]

> A simple test shows the console is still working, i.e., pressing a key *does*
> generate an interrupt and ISR *does* read the correct char value.
> 
> I really cannot think of anything else that might make busybox stuck here. 
> Any clue?  Anybody else is using busybox with more recent kernels?

I have a smilar problem on my DECstation. Using 2.4.8 with the Debian
boot-floppies (based on busybox), the machine hangs when waiting for
the first keypress after the splash screen.
When booting 2.4.8 with my "normal" installation into single user mode,
I get a shell prompt, but cannot enter anything. I first thought of
a problem with the DECstation keyboard driver, but the same happens
on serial console. I have tested various kernel version with regard
to this - the last one working for me is 2.4.5.
When booting my "normal" installation with 2.4.8 into multiuser mode,
the machine crashes somewhere in the init scripts.

Is your box little or big endian?

Greetings,
Karsten
-- 
#include <standard_disclaimer>
Nach Paragraph 28 Abs. 3 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
oder Uebermittlung meiner Daten fuer Werbezwecke oder fuer die Markt- oder
Meinungsforschung.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-21  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-21  1:21 busybox does not like 2.4.8, or the other way around? Jun Sun
2001-09-21  2:02 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-09-21  2:02   ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2001-09-21  3:56 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-09-21  5:30 ` Karsten Merker [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-26 15:53 Marc Karasek
2001-09-26 16:47 ` Karsten Merker
2001-09-26 17:26 ` Jun Sun
2001-09-26 21:56   ` Geoffrey Espin
2001-09-27 17:21     ` Jun Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010921073007.B618@excalibur.cologne.de \
    --to=karsten@excalibur.cologne.de \
    --cc=jsun@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox