* Support for physical memory above 0x20000000
@ 2002-01-08 19:07 Kevin Paul Herbert
2002-01-08 22:21 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Paul Herbert @ 2002-01-08 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
I'm working with a somewhat dated kernel (2.4.2+patches) and have
discovered that there are problems with physical memory that does not
map into KSEG0/KSEG1. I looked over the list archives (manually, I
couldn't find a search interface) and it appears that this is still
the case for current kernels (at least as of a note from last summer,
the last time the issue seems to have come up.)
Obviously, phys_to_virt() is going to be a problem but besides this
I'm wondering what anybody may have done to support physical memory
that is not always mapped into the virtual address space, so that I
don't have to reinvent the wheel.
When I tell the kernel about the memory above 0x20000000, userland
fails to start; the kernel gets as far as execve()'ing init, but
nothing happens (interrupts are enabled; I get echo on the console,
but nothing from userland).
Thanks,
Kevin
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Support for physical memory above 0x20000000
2002-01-08 19:07 Support for physical memory above 0x20000000 Kevin Paul Herbert
@ 2002-01-08 22:21 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2002-01-08 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Paul Herbert; +Cc: linux-mips
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:07:53AM -0800, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote:
> I'm working with a somewhat dated kernel (2.4.2+patches) and have
> discovered that there are problems with physical memory that does not
> map into KSEG0/KSEG1. I looked over the list archives (manually, I
> couldn't find a search interface) and it appears that this is still
> the case for current kernels (at least as of a note from last summer,
> the last time the issue seems to have come up.)
>
> Obviously, phys_to_virt() is going to be a problem but besides this
> I'm wondering what anybody may have done to support physical memory
> that is not always mapped into the virtual address space, so that I
> don't have to reinvent the wheel.
>
> When I tell the kernel about the memory above 0x20000000, userland
> fails to start; the kernel gets as far as execve()'ing init, but
> nothing happens (interrupts are enabled; I get echo on the console,
> but nothing from userland).
Correct. There are two ways to solve this problem. For the 32-bit kernel
I've got a highmem patch and the 64-bit kernel memory limits are the
hardware's memory limits. I'll post the highmem patch soon. I was
planning to have it ready by now but a flu sent me to bed instead ...
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-08 23:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-08 19:07 Support for physical memory above 0x20000000 Kevin Paul Herbert
2002-01-08 22:21 ` Ralf Baechle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox