From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>,
linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: FPU emulator unsafe for SMP?
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:05:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020220160513.A17227@dea.linux-mips.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020220153608.5781A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:46:32PM +0100
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:46:32PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > The context register is actually intended to be used for indexing a flat
> > 4mb array of pagetables on a 32-bit processor. It's a bit ill-defined
> > on R4000-class processors as it assumes a size of 8 bytes per pte, so
> > cannot be used in the Linux/MIPS kernel without shifting bits around.
>
> Ill??? I think someone was just longsighted enough not to limit PTEs to
> 38-bit physical addresses. A shift costs a single cycle if we want to
> save memory.
The idea of the register was to directly generate the address of a PTE.
An extra instruction in TLB exception handlers isn't only visible in
performance, it also means introducing constraints on the address itself -
an arithmetic shift by one bit for 4 byte PTEs will result in the two
high bits of the address being identical, an arithmetic shift will make
the high bit a null etc. Just on 32-bit kernels on 64-bit hw you're
lucky, you have a bit 32 in c0_context which will be shifted into bit 31.
Messy?
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-20 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-15 1:56 FPU emulator unsafe for SMP? Jun Sun
2002-02-15 2:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-15 7:20 ` Jun Sun
2002-02-15 8:30 ` Jun Sun
2002-02-15 9:59 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-15 9:59 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-19 22:05 ` Jun Sun
2002-02-19 22:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-20 0:08 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-20 0:08 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-20 1:12 ` Jun Sun
2002-02-20 3:28 ` Greg Lindahl
2002-02-20 4:24 ` Jun Sun
2002-02-20 4:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-20 9:48 ` Jun Sun
2002-02-20 10:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-20 10:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-20 13:50 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-20 20:53 ` Greg Lindahl
2002-02-20 13:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-20 4:48 ` Greg Lindahl
2002-02-20 9:27 ` Florian Lohoff
2002-02-20 13:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-20 9:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-02-20 11:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-20 13:10 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-20 8:27 ` Dominic Sweetman
2002-02-20 9:30 ` Florian Lohoff
2002-02-20 13:56 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-20 13:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-20 14:42 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-20 14:42 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-20 14:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-02-20 15:05 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2002-02-20 15:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-02-20 13:03 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-15 8:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-15 8:14 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-02-15 10:57 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-19 22:02 ` Jun Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020220160513.A17227@dea.linux-mips.net \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox