Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-mips mailing list <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: [Q]: Was this chunk of a patch really intended?
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:35:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020816093531.GG10730@lug-owl.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1992 bytes --]

Hi!

I'm once again looking at R4k6 V1.7 support. Diffing out the patch which
removed V1.7 support, I find this chunk:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1010,14 +921,12 @@
                blast_dcache32_page_indexed(page);
        }
 out:
-       __restore_flags(flags);
 }

 static void r4k_flush_cache_page_d32i32_r4600(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
                                              unsigned long page)
 {      
        struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
-       unsigned long flags;
        pgd_t *pgdp;
        pmd_t *pmdp;
        pte_t *ptep;
@@ -1032,7 +941,6 @@
 #ifdef DEBUG_CACHE
        printk("cpage[%d,%08lx]", (int)mm->context, page);
 #endif
-       __save_and_cli(flags);
        page &= PAGE_MASK;
        pgdp = pgd_offset(mm, page);
        pmdp = pmd_offset(pgdp, page);
@@ -1062,7 +970,6 @@
                blast_dcache32_page_indexed(page ^ dcache_waybit);
        }
 out:
-       __restore_flags(flags);
 }

 /* If the addresses passed to these routines are valid, they are
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Depending on this function's name, I think this part of the patch is not
that shiny. I'd suspect to leave __save_and_cli()/__restore_flags() in
this function, or to rename the function, as it used for more than only
R4600:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
        switch(mips_cpu.cputype) {
        case CPU_R4600:                 /* QED style two way caches? */
        case CPU_R4700:
        case CPU_R5000:
        case CPU_NEVADA:
                _flush_cache_page = r4k_flush_cache_page_d32i32_r4600;
        }
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw   .   jbglaw@lug-owl.de   .   +49-172-7608481
	 -- New APT-Proxy written in shell script --
	   http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2002-08-16  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020816093531.GG10730@lug-owl.de \
    --to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox