From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>,
linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Subject: Re: New binutils for kernel
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:10:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020820081058.A29182@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020820165835.B26852@linux-mips.org>; from ralf@linux-mips.org on Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:58:35PM +0200
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:50:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > > So any comments?
> >
> > Well, I think 2.13's a good idea, but it's very new. I'd say that was
> > acceptable as long as you're looking at MIPS64 only, not at MIPS32.
>
> Such considerations have kept us back at antique levels of binutils. And
> juggling with several different versions for userland, and two kernel
> flavours is evil ...
I have no problems with binutils 2.13.90.0.4 on Linux/mips. I rebuild
everything, from kernel to rpms, for Linux/mipsel with it. They seem
to run fine.
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020819171238.A7457@linux-mips.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020820161204.8700H-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
2002-08-20 14:29 ` New binutils for kernel Ralf Baechle
2002-08-20 14:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-20 14:58 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-08-20 15:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-20 15:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-08-20 15:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-20 15:17 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-08-20 15:10 ` H. J. Lu [this message]
2002-08-20 17:27 ` Karsten Merker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020820081058.A29182@lucon.org \
--to=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox